Currently the conditional fields seem to own the dependent fields completely. By trying to manage the display of dependents I encountered the following behavior. The selection labels of the conditional field are used a labels for the dependents. If I hide the conditional field all the dependent fields will be hidden as well. So I have to live with these labels. I think it would be more flexible if I could disable these kinds of "selectionlabels". This way I would have a real choice between these kind of labels and the normal labels of the dependent fields.

kind regards!


MrPaulDriver’s picture

Yes, I am finding the same.

Tempted to mark as a bug really.

adriancotter’s picture

Issue summary: View changes

I agree that this is a bug. I can of course hide these fields through CSS and the like, but this has caused me to wonder what the hell was going on more than once -- when fields started to disappear. I didn't connect it with tweaking the display.

Leeteq’s picture

Category: Feature request » Bug report