Currently the NAT node(s) can be joined to a term view via the "NAT Node" relationship, but there is no corresponding "NAT Term" relationship available to join {taxonomy_term_data} directly to {nat} in a content view.

Screenshot of View settings with Relationship to NAT Node

CommentFileSizeAuthor
#4 nat-views-relationship-term-to-nat-1404594-4-D7.patch428 bytesbrooke_heaton
#2 NAT_Node_Node_Relationship.png348.84 KBbrooke_heaton
#1 1404594-2-term-to-nat-relationship.patch464 bytesbiwashingtonial

Comments

biwashingtonial’s picture

biwashingtonial commented
Assigned: biwashingtonial » Unassigned
Status: Active » Needs review
StatusFileSize
new 1404594-2-term-to-nat-relationship.patch464 bytes
brooke_heaton’s picture

brooke_heaton commented
Issue summary: View changes
StatusFileSize
new NAT_Node_Node_Relationship.png348.84 KB

Confirmed that on Node view - relationship to NAT Node is possible but relationship to NAT Term is not.

brooke_heaton’s picture

brooke_heaton commented

Patch #1 is missing comma after 

'filter' => array(
      'handler' => 'views_handler_filter_numeric'
    )

Need to reroll against DEV

brooke_heaton’s picture

brooke_heaton commented
StatusFileSize
new nat-views-relationship-term-to-nat-1404594-4-D7.patch428 bytes

Corrected patch #1 by biwashingtonial and added missing comma. Should roll clean against DEV now.

  • brooke_heaton authored c53a3c3 on 7.x-2.x 
    #1404594 by brooke_heaton, biwashingtonial: Add Views relationship for...
brooke_heaton’s picture

brooke_heaton commented
Status: Needs review » Reviewed & tested by the community
brooke_heaton’s picture

brooke_heaton commented
Status: Reviewed & tested by the community » Fixed

Status: Fixed » Closed (fixed)

Automatically closed - issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.