hey

please add "Administration" package group to the info file (package = Administration)

this is not entirely correct as per Drupal standards, but please think of the admins ;)
it's really annoying to have 50-100 modules in the "Other" fieldset/tab.

many modules follow similar approach (other administration, permission and caching/performance modules) to help admins

Support from Acquia helps fund testing for Drupal Acquia logo

Comments

lpalgarvio’s picture

Title: package group » Update status advanced settings » package name
Issue tags: +package name
Leeteq’s picture

Version: 6.x-1.x-dev » 7.x-1.x-dev

Yes, also for 7.x.

Leeteq’s picture

Priority: Normal » Minor
klonos’s picture

Yes please!

klonos’s picture

Title: Update status advanced settings » package name » Add 'package = Administration' entry in update_advanced.info
Issue summary: View changes

...better issue title might help.

AohRveTPV’s picture

this is not entirely correct as per Drupal standards

Why do you say this? https://www.drupal.org/node/542202 lists "Administration" as a value one might use for "package".

AohRveTPV’s picture

I guess this is why you said it is not correct per Drupal standards:

In general, this property should only be used by large multi-module packages, or by modules meant to extend these packages, such as Fields, Views, Commerce, Organic Groups, and the like. All other modules should leave this blank. As a guideline, four or more modules that depend on each other (or all on a single module) make a good candidate for a package. Fewer probably do not. An exception to this rule is the "Development" package, which should be used for any modules which are code development tool modules.

"Administration" is probably another exception to the general rule, like "Development". Other popular modules such as Administration Menu use the "Administration" package, despite not extending a base module or having codependent modules.

The documentation of the package property needs some clarification on this issue of using common packages for categorization of modules, in my opinion.

AohRveTPV’s picture

Status: Active » Needs review
FileSize
345 bytes
Leeteq’s picture

IMO, this module belongs in the administration category.