Notice: Use of undefined constant NODE_BUILD_PREVIEW - assumed 'NODE_BUILD_PREVIEW' in vud_node_node_view() (Zeile 147 von ./modules/vote_up_down/vud_node/vud_node.module).
Notice: Use of undefined constant NODE_BUILD_SEARCH_INDEX - assumed 'NODE_BUILD_SEARCH_INDEX' in vud_node_node_view() (Zeile 148 von ./modules/vote_up_down/vud_node/vud_node.module).
Notice: Use of undefined constant NODE_BUILD_SEARCH_RESULT - assumed 'NODE_BUILD_SEARCH_RESULT' in vud_node_node_view() (Zeile 149 von ./modules/vote_up_down/vud_node/vud_node.module).
Notice: Use of undefined constant NODE_BUILD_RSS - assumed 'NODE_BUILD_RSS' in vud_node_node_view() (Zeile 150 von ./modules/vote_up_down/vud_node/vud_node.module).
Notice: Undefined property: stdClass::$build_mode in vud_node_node_view() (Zeile 152 von ./all/modules/vote_up_down/vud_node/vud_node.module).
Notice: Undefined variable: a3 in vud_node_node_view() (Zeile 161 von ./all/modules/vote_up_down/vud_node/vud_node.module).
| Comment | File | Size | Author |
|---|---|---|---|
| #10 | vud_node-NODE_BUILD_PREVIEW-1192508-10.patch | 2.16 KB | robbertnl |
| #8 | vud_node-NODE_BUILD_PREVIEW-1192508-8.patch | 1.18 KB | larskleiner |
Comments
Comment #1
TimelessDomain commentedi am pretty sure #1194274: Port vud_node to D7 will solve this - since the patch is modded to handle build modes
Comment #2
univate commentedCorrect the patch in that issue fixes this.
Comment #3
therobyouknow commentedStill see this problem myself (the last entry in: https://drupal.org/node/1194274 was in March 2012 and the latest development release of the module is March 2013, so I would assume that any work from the other issue would be in the module by now):
Notice: Use of undefined constant NODE_BUILD_PREVIEW - assumed 'NODE_BUILD_PREVIEW' in vud_node_node_view() (line 147 of ../sites/all/modules/vote_up_down/vud_node/vud_node.module).
Notice: Use of undefined constant NODE_BUILD_SEARCH_INDEX - assumed 'NODE_BUILD_SEARCH_INDEX' in vud_node_node_view() (line 148 of ../sites/all/modules/vote_up_down/vud_node/vud_node.module).
Notice: Use of undefined constant NODE_BUILD_SEARCH_RESULT - assumed 'NODE_BUILD_SEARCH_RESULT' in vud_node_node_view() (line 149 of ../sites/all/modules/vote_up_down/vud_node/vud_node.module).
Notice: Use of undefined constant NODE_BUILD_RSS - assumed 'NODE_BUILD_RSS' in vud_node_node_view() (line 150 of ../sites/all/modules/vote_up_down/vud_node/vud_node.module).
Notice: Undefined property: stdClass::$build_mode in vud_node_node_view() (line 152 of ../sites/all/modules/vote_up_down/vud_node/vud_node.module).
Notice: Undefined variable: a3 in vud_node_node_view() (line 161 of ../sites/all/modules/vote_up_down/vud_node/vud_node.module).
Comment #4
vm commentedBased on my reading of similar issues there has been no patch committed to deal with the issue.
Comment #5
Diogenes commented@eule
Try the replacement module posted here and see if it works.
https://drupal.org/node/1194274#comment-7652549
Comment #6
eule commented@Diogenes Thanks but using D8 for now
Comment #7
vm commentedremarking duplicate. Unsure why the need to change the status. The status on the issue with the reworked code is suffice.
Comment #8
larskleiner commentedRe-opening this issue as this patch addresses just this specific problem in 7.x-1.x-dev, ie replaces D6 with D7 view modes (I also removed the redundant $a3 variable).
Comment #9
alesr commentedPatch works.
Reviewed the code.
Looks like RTBC.
Comment #10
robbertnl commentedI am not sure about this patch. Because it removes the teaser variable while there is a condition for this variable.
It looks like this bug is a left over of the Drupal 6 port to Drupal 7
This is why i changed the patch a bit. But maybe its just my misunderstanding
Comment #11
sin commentedHi! I tried patch #10 and it works, thank you!
Comment #12
pwiniacki commented@robbertnl confirmed - https://www.drupal.org/node/1192508#comment-9553085 is working fine, however I'm new around this module so can't say much about the code. Thanks.
Comment #13
unqunqI confirm that all notices are gone after patch in #10 was applied.
Comment #14
goldI've also tested this just now. The issue is resolved with the patch at #10 and the code standards in the patch are looking good.
Comment #16
marvil07 commentedThanks for the patches, sorry about the enormous delay.