Closed (fixed)
Project:
phpBB Forum Integration
Version:
6.x-2.0-beta10
Component:
Miscellaneous
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Support request
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
20 Feb 2010 at 13:51 UTC
Updated:
9 Jan 2012 at 07:59 UTC
I've just upgraded from beta9 to beta10 and suddenly I have over 60 instances of "Anonymous" being logged in showing in my "Who's online" block in Drupal. :(
Comments
Comment #1
phreadom commentedComment #2
vb commentedStrange. I think I have changed nothing in that area. On my dev pc I see only myself or 0 guests when i logout.
Comment #3
vb commentedPlease comment line 77 and 82 in file PhpbbVBridgeApp.php and see what happen
Comment #4
phreadom commentedWell, after making that edit the number seems to be dropping now. It went down to 57, 53, 51... I let it sit for awhile while I put coffee on, and then it was down to 29... then 21... now 20. :)
Now 15 in the span of a minute or two. We'll see if it goes all the way back down.
UPDATE: It appears to be back to normal now. No "Anonymous" users are showing up in the list. Only the 3 actual logged in users. :) (like 10 minutes after I posted the previous message)
Comment #5
vb commentedPlease try to restore changes and we will see if that was the case. I do not know why and not sure.
Comment #6
phreadom commentedI restored the changes and immediately saw an Anonymous user... it's back up to 17 again currently. :(
So it's pretty clearly something related to that.
Comment #7
vb commentedThanks
Comment #8
phreadom commentedI'm just going to disable it again for now...
There are only 4 people actually logged in currently. Not 130. :( I'm not sure what detrimental effects there could be from allowing that to keep going up?
And what are the side effects from forcing session activation each time like this?
Comment #9
vb commentedOK. I have already made beta11 with that fix.
This function is calling one time on the drupal page where activated hidden authentication block.
It is allowed way by phpbb team.
In beta10, 11 has been developed the new way of initialisation for fast execution, so something may be not compeletely tested.
Comment #10
fizk commented