Closed (fixed)
Project:
Service links
Version:
7.x-2.x-dev
Component:
Miscellaneous
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Support request
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
8 Nov 2012 at 22:50 UTC
Updated:
26 May 2021 at 18:49 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent
Comments
Comment #1
mengi commentedWould love to see a new release as well.
Comment #2
mariogalan commentedThis module is even used in Commerce Kickstart and, as youd said, it's basically dead. That's a little weird.
And with about 25,000 installations, it should see a little more action but I guess that, in the actual state, it works well enough for most people.
Comment #3
nonsieI'm willing to help maintain it. I usually end up using this on 90% of the sites and keep on applying the patches I've submitted.
Comment #4
rcross commentedi would also be willing to help maintain this module.
Comment #5
servantleader commentedSeeing as there has been no response by the current maintainers, one of you who are willing to help should follow the procedure here:
http://drupal.org/node/251466
Comment #6
simon georges commentedI was going to propose to co-maintain too, but seeing as so many people are already willing, I think I'll back off on this one ;-)
I'll let one of you moving the issue to the webmaster's queue.
Comment #7
nonsieI've sent the current maintainer an email, let's see what comes from it. If I do not hear back I'll move this thread into webmaster queue
Comment #8
TheCrow commentedHi folks, seems i had troubles with mail filtering.
As far i got there is not more a co-mantainer, but following the issue queue there are not so many RTBC patches, to be precise i see just 4 of them and about the other issues, many look as duplicates.
Some of you have can help to clean the issue queue? That would be helpful.
This module is not dead, just i was trying to elaborate a third version, but time is always few and didn't see so much support, so i procrastinated it being busy with other stuff :).
Comment #9
simon georges commentedOk, I did a little triage, I indeed closed 3 or 4 duplicates, and the count of RTBC is now 6 (but there are a bunch of "Needs review", and I think some (or a lot) of them are indeed appropriate).
I changed some status / categories / version to have a cleaner issue queue (at least for 7.x version, as I don't really care about the 6.x version any more ;-)).
Comment #10
TheCrow commentedThanks a lot, now is more clear!
Comment #11
simon georges commentedSo, should we close this issue ? TheCrow, do you need a co-maintainers on the project, or is it fine now (and you just needed a little push ;-))?
Comment #12
jenlamptonI also love this module and use it on almost every site I build. I, for one, would love to see more maintainers on the project. It's always hard to find spare time to spend in the issue queues, and the more people who are spending their spare time on Service Links, the better Service Links gets! (well, within reason). :)
Since there are so many willing candidates, @TheCrow, would you be willing to allow some of them to
Maintain issuesor maybe alsoWrite to VCS?Comment #13
TheCrow commentedI think this project needs a couple of co-mantainer who has time to spend with patches, tests, and fixes, at least we can have a distinct patcher and tester, i would avoid wild push in the repo so only one should commit the modifies and another can mantain issues :)
I am evaluating who wants care for it, so i can spend my time with this: #1353802: Service Links 3.x plan.
Comment #14
simon georges commented@TheCrow, on that note, could you create the 7.x-3.x branch for issues so we can start moving "Feature requests" to 3.x-dev?
(The triage of D7 issues is almost done).
Comment #15
TheCrow commentedSimon is the new co-mantainer with VCS access! Congratulations :)
About the requests send to the master is better, at this moment there is not any 3.x... but if you think this could help you to mantain the issue queue, feel free to create a new branch :)
Comment #16
simon georges commentedWow... thanks. Ok, let's dive into the "Needs review" issues.
Comment #17
avpadernoAre other users still interested in being co-maintainers?
Comment #18
avpadernoThe original request was asking if the module was still maintained. I take that has been already answered by adding a new maintainer. I am closing this issue.