Closed (fixed)
Project:
Facet API Extra
Version:
7.x-1.x-dev
Component:
Code
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Feature request
Assigned:
Unassigned
Issue tags:
Reporter:
Created:
31 Jul 2011 at 14:26 UTC
Updated:
4 Jan 2014 at 01:11 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent
Comments
Comment #1
drunken monkeySubscribing.
Comment #2
cpliakas commentedBumping down in priority, because someone could implement this outside of the module as a result of the pluggable filter system.
Comment #3
cpliakas commentedAdding to the Contrib component, which means that I am looking for this functionality to be added outside of this module in a separate contrib.
Comment #4
cpliakas commentedMoving over to Facet API Extra for consideration.
Comment #5
SergeyR commentedmay be somebody show me case from real life -if hypotetically implemented "don't show items that don't narrow result" is NOT ENOUGH
still now -i cant imagine such cases
At least it must be different priority untill no real life requests are presented
Comment #6
SergeyR commentedchanging my opinion about this issue
i think in case when only 1 item happens to be -is not right just hide it !
in this approach we will never see dependent facets as parent choice is hidden
another idea -to make this choice automatically -also not correct
i think may right compromize here to ASK user is this the single facet item appropriate or not? -so in another word is it sense to show dependent facets (it may be not the only one item!!!)
The pure realization of this issue is correct for case where no dependent facets exist ,or may be they also have the only one item. Little bit sofisticated logic ))
Comment #7
ygerasimov commentedImplemented. Committed a3655ca