Hi Moshe,
while trying (without success) to run drush sql select nid from nodes just ran into dispatching code.
(This extra logging helps me in the future solving this sql problem.)
| Comment | File | Size | Author |
|---|---|---|---|
| drush-inc.patch | 1.26 KB | clemens.tolboom |
Hi Moshe,
while trying (without success) to run drush sql select nid from nodes just ran into dispatching code.
(This extra logging helps me in the future solving this sql problem.)
| Comment | File | Size | Author |
|---|---|---|---|
| drush-inc.patch | 1.26 KB | clemens.tolboom |
Comments
Comment #1
clemens.tolboomThe patch is handy. My problem has nothing to do with drush but with my bash script :-/
Comment #2
moshe weitzman commentedThe extra verbose stuff looks good.
You added too much indentation to one comment and you removed an array_reverse() without mentioning why.
Comment #3
clemens.tolboomSorry for not mentioning. I pushed the array_reverse up out the if. As a DRY (don't repeat yourself)
What is the best way to tell such a change. Just in the patch?
Comment #4
moshe weitzman commentedFolks think this is worthwhile?
Comment #5
clemens.tolboomOn second though this might be worth an --terse option ... if you are interested i will provide a --terse patch
Comment #6
moshe weitzman commentedI'm now not so keen on this. This really helps understand drush_dispatch which a command author does not need to understand. Only developers of drush itself really care about this. My .02 anyway. I'll leave this open for a bit.
Comment #7
clemens.tolboomAre you waiting for a new patch then?
Comment #8
moshe weitzman commented-v option now takes a value of 1 or 2 or 3, etc. higher numbers mean more debug messages.