Since module name is 'Action' but somewhere it has been referred as 'Actions' module.We should decide whether it should be called 'Actions' or 'Action' or it is not a big issue and should be ignored.
| Comment | File | Size | Author |
|---|---|---|---|
| #11 | actions-machine-name.png | 36.6 KB | yoroy |
| #9 | action-2862259-9.patch | 753 bytes | renatog |
| #6 | Actions_Action.png | 17.24 KB | renatog |
| #2 | action-2862259-2.patch | 753 bytes | gaurav.kapoor |
Comments
Comment #2
gaurav.kapoor commentedComment #3
gaurav.kapoor commentedComment #5
anemes commentedComment #6
renatog commentedAnalyzing the context really got more readable this way.
It's ok for me.
Thank you very much @gauravkapoor.
Good Work and Good Weekend.
Regards.
Comment #7
lauriiiComment #9
renatog commentedRe-up patch.
Comment #11
yoroy commentedWhat's not matching is the user facing module name ("Actions") and the machine name ("Action").
Not sure this is worth fixing, but if you want to, then in user-facing text we should keep referring to "Actions".
Comment #15
andypostComment #18
jungleI'd mark this a duplicate as #2811663 filed early than this.