Closed (fixed)
Project:
Drupal core
Version:
8.0.x-dev
Component:
theme system
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Task
Assigned:
Unassigned
Issue tags:
Reporter:
Created:
11 Sep 2015 at 17:04 UTC
Updated:
9 Dec 2015 at 10:14 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent, Most recent file
Comments
Comment #2
dcrocks commentedHere is a quick patch. Are there other small followups that could be added here?
Comment #3
dcrocks commentedduh
Comment #4
dcrocks commentedAdded one more small change.
Comment #5
rainbowarrayWe may want input from Win and/or manual testing on the upgrade path. Since Wim suggested this change, should be fine, but it would be great to have sign-off from him.
Comment #6
dcrocks commentedSince 8.0 has a RC can we still fix the cache setting issue or just the documentation error?
Comment #7
joelpittetMostly documentation but but the patch removes something small in the update.
Comment #8
xjmThanks for the patch!
This patch seems to be several changes, some of which are rc eligible as docs-only changes, and one of which is not clear to me.
Can we split it into two issues?
One line summaries need to be one line, with additional information on additional paragraphs. Reference: https://www.drupal.org/node/1354#drupal
Comment #9
dcrocks commentedAnother patch did part of what this patch was supposed to so restarted with a new patch. Also split so this has only the documentation fix.
Comment #10
joelpittet'site variables' I think should be 'page variables' as they were really only available at the page level? Could be wrong.
Comment #11
dcrocks commentedCreated a 2nd followup, #2614506: Followup to Use a Branding Block cache fix - 2005546 and cleaned some minor IS problems.
Comment #12
dcrocks commentedHow about both.
ps. @alexpott Do you know where the cache line was fixed or the @file doc fix was done?
Comment #13
wim leersI don't think I'm necessary here.
Comment #14
dcrocks commentedThis is do trivial. Could someone RTBC it?
Comment #15
joelpittetYup thanks for the bump.
Comment #16
lauriiiRTBC++
Comment #17
xjmLet's actually just remove this. We don't need to link the issue that added code since that can be discovered via git blame. If there is some specific information from the issue that is relevant we should include it in the docs, but I don't think that's the case here.
Thanks!
Comment #18
dcrocks commentedMade change.
Comment #19
joelpittetGood call, thanks @xjm and @dcrocks
Comment #20
alexpottCommitted ff12935 and pushed to 80.x and 8.1.x. Thanks!