Closed (fixed)
Project:
Project
Version:
4.7.x-2.0
Component:
Releases
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Bug report
Assigned:
Reporter:
Created:
13 Nov 2006 at 16:34 UTC
Updated:
27 Nov 2006 at 21:15 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent file
Hi,
I've asked a couple of days ago to unpublish some of my automatically created release nodes for the module "weather". I wanted to unpublish the nodes for some old branches, i.e. I don't see the need to generate a nightly tarball from the CVS version in those cases. Those releases are 4.3.x-1.x, 4.4.x-1.x, 4.5.x-1.x, and 4.7.x-1.x. However, they have appeared again. I guess that the old release nodes are still unpublished, but the script just checked if there are such releases available -- and if not, automatically creates them. Am I right in thinking that I have now two release nodes for each of the above mentioned branches, one published, one unpublished?
Regards,
Tobias
| Comment | File | Size | Author |
|---|---|---|---|
| #2 | package-release-nodes-no-republish.patch.txt | 2.3 KB | dww |
Comments
Comment #1
dwwwhoops. ;)
ugh, this is sort of complicated, since the existing workflow is that when you first add a new release node, it's unpublished. so, the script can't just filter on only published nodes, since that would make it not really have any work to do at all. ;)
however, i suppose it should filter for release nodes that are a) unpublished but b) already have a filename. in that case, it shouldn't re-generate the tarball and re-publish the release (currently, it always tries to set the published bit on a node when it's done, to handle the common case of publishing the node for the first time).
luckily, this is a small fix. stay tuned.
p.s. no, you don't have duplicate nodes. it just re-published the same nodes i had already unpublished.
Comment #2
dwwComment #3
dwwnatrak said this is RTBC, so i committed to DRUPAL-4-7--2 as revision 1.1.2.17.
Comment #4
dwwi just re-unpublished all the contrib releases that were 4.5.x or older (per thread on infrastructure email list)
and also "weather 4.7.x-1.x" by request...
Comment #5
toddy commentedGreat, thanks a lot for your fast response and the special treatment for my 4.7.x-1.x release ... ;-)
Comment #6
(not verified) commented