There used to be 1x officially supported release for activity. Now I only see the dev version of activity 2. Please atleast consider releasing a beta version of activity 2 which is little stable. That also can give a grounding place for some site owners and testers to tinker with.

Comments

rbrandon’s picture

I agree, with a set dev release we could at least test that it meets our needs and recommend it to people using it with our modules.

ajayg’s picture

I see a note has been added to the project page that 2.x is quite stable. I wonder why not release then? or if you think there are a few blocking bugs for release, please let us know so we can ralley around to get those fixed.

ajayg’s picture

Also unless the module is released, security team won't be doing any security checks.

ajayg’s picture

Title: No official release? » Why not release?
Category: task » bug

Is there a reason you have not released this module? If you have a list of critical issues blocking the release could you please list here so we can focus to get those out?

If you are concerned wth upgrade from 1.x , you can still release with caveate this is no upgrade path. And right now other folks can't work on upgrade path since there is no 1.x to install and try upgrade.

So please help us to help you !

sirkitree’s picture

Assigned: Unassigned » sirkitree
Category: bug » support
Priority: Critical » Major

Soon I hope ;) I've discontinued support for Activity 1.x so that I can concentrate on helping Scott more with the Activity 2.x. Next up I'll be trying to get a roadmap for us all so that we can get a tag.

sirkitree’s picture

Title: Why not release? » Roadmap to release
Category: support » task

Changing title, turning into task. I'm currently reviewing everything so should be able to have a list of issue to resolve before we do a tag soon.

sirkitree’s picture

jcisio’s picture

Are they critical for an alpha (or even beta) release? I didn't look closely, but it seems only the last one is critical.

sirkitree’s picture

I think you're right. If we can get that last one fixed an alpha should be possible.

Gabriel R.’s picture

Shameful subscriber comment.

pribeh’s picture

Quadruply shameful subscriber.

Scott Reynolds’s picture

I do not believe number 1 is still happening for most people.

As long as the last one isn't happening then I think we are all good.

jcisio’s picture

The last one has been fixed for a while. Go alpha ;)

ajayg’s picture

So what is preventing now to goto alpha?

ukrdrupal’s picture

...subscribing with interest :-)

sirkitree’s picture

Status: Active » Fixed

Alpha has been tagged and should be available soon.

Status: Fixed » Closed (fixed)

Automatically closed -- issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.

rjbrown99’s picture

Assigned: sirkitree » Unassigned
Priority: Major » Normal
Status: Closed (fixed) » Active

Not to kick open a closet issue, but this is still on the main module page as the roadmap so I figured it was best to discuss here. I'm happy to move to a new issue if the maintainers prefer that.

There is an alpha release but I'd like to discuss what would need to happen to move to 6.x-2.0-alpha2 or beta1 or rc1 or release. I have been using the module in prod now for close to 2 years. I am manually maintaining the following patches in my local tree beyond 6.x-2.0-alpha1:

#1002952: Regenerate runs into a scalability wall with large node counts, patch from #9 (#23 seems better, but the issue still seems to needs work)
#1172732: Poor index usage with some activity queries, patch from #2
#1186544: Add new hook for activity_delete(), patch from #1

There also seems to have been a fair amount of GSOC commits to -dev from a project over the summer.

My question is this: What do we collectively think should be on the map to fix between now and another release? I'd love to get back on a mainline release branch of code so I can stop maintaining my own patched version. I'm willing to help tie up outstanding issues if need be.

sirkitree’s picture

Hey rj,

I'd love your help here actually. Scott and I have both been just not quite interested enough lately to make the time in our busy schedules for this module, so any other helping hands would be appreciated.

Being an advocate for getting patches that are important to you reviewed would be a great start.

Also, taking a look at the current issues and noting here what other patches you think would be important for a release candidate or beta would help.

rjbrown99’s picture

OK, I'll go through the issue queue and chime back in another subject if anything looks important. No problem, I'll try to do that before the end of the week. I'll also change status where needed (IE, open issues with a patch that are not marked as needs work/review, etc.) I'm going to close some things or propose closing them as well, so if I overstep my bounds here please tell me and I'll stop.

DamienMcKenna’s picture

Is this list also representative of the items needed for a stable 7.x release, or has anyone reviewed that yet? Thanks.

sirkitree’s picture

hasn't really been reviewed