Closed (outdated)
Project:
Privatemsg
Version:
7.x-2.x-dev
Component:
Code
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Feature request
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
11 Apr 2009 at 02:27 UTC
Updated:
25 Jul 2022 at 08:14 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent
Comments
Comment #1
litwol commentedThat is a good idea, i like it. seems one of those obvious ideas i overlooked.
Comment #2
aharown07 commentedGlad to hear it
Comment #3
berdirI'm not sure how to handle that. The problem is that we currently only show the recipients of a thread, not a single message. So it could be confusing when you send a message to 10 users, that user only replies to you but it would be displayed in the same thread.
We could simply create a new thread with the same title...
Comment #4
aharown07 commentedNot sure what to say about that... it's one of the challenges of making a messaging system work like a discussion thread. But I think the option you suggest is probably workable. As it is now, users wd frequently have to cut and paste in a new message to reply to the sender... and some would be doing this often because they don't really want to talk to the whole group. ...It's the "private" part of "private messaging" :)
Comment #5
litwol commentedI think creating a new thread on 'reply to one' is a good method.
Comment #6
GeekyLass commentedThis is something I would like to see. I mean you could make the list of people have check boxes and you can check who you want the reply to go to. This permits reply to one, reply to some, and reply to all.
Comment #7
Bilmar commentedsubscribing - this would be a great new feature!
I look forward to help testing with development.
Comment #8
berdir@GeekyLass: I'm not sure. The issue that we don't display for every single message who recieved it. if you can write to different users in the same thread, it might get really messy.
What I'm thinking about is a simple "reply" link, that will lead to a new message form with the subject and to field pre-filled.
Comment #9
YK85 commented+1 subscribing
taking gmail and other email services as an example, there is a 'reply' and 'reply to all' available for each message.
thanks!
Comment #10
aharown07 commentedFrom a database standpoint, does anyone know how Gmail does it?
Haven't been able to get a close look at gmail's solution myself but it seems like a standard "reply" copies the text of the entire conversation so far into the new message as well.
Comment #11
YK85 commentedYes, the way other mail services work is 'reply' copies the whole message body and populates the To: only with the specific sender. Choosing 'reply to all' copies the whole message body and the To: with the sender as well as the other recipients of the message.
Comment #12
aharown07 commentedI wonder what the objection is do doing this in Privatemsg... it's probably already in a thread somewhere but I don't recall seeing it.
From a data standpoint, it's tidier to not duplicate data, but I don't think its a good trade where important functionality is missing.
Comment #13
berdirAs I said above, it would be easy to allow in-thread reply to author of a message only.
BUT, the problem is that you don't see the recipients of each message when viewing a thread, so there is no way to tell if a message has been sent just to you or all participants of a thread. Since you like comparing with gmail, gmail *does* display the recipients per message/mail.
Either we solve this by showing the recipients per message or we can only add a reply link to each message which will start a new thread to just that person (Which could include a reference or the text from the referenced message)
Comment #15
GKent commentedHi, everyone,
I was all excited when I saw that this topic was being discussed, until I looked at the dates. My heart sank. Gosh, I hope that something can be done soon.
I've got a site where this default that any reply is a "reply to all" messes people up all the time. It causes people to get lots of unnecessary notifications to come to the site to check messages that aren't really for them. And you know what happens when you cry "wolf!" too often. People stop responding. It's a problem.
At the very least, a quick fix that would make a reply to the original sender possible, even if that did not include any message content, but rather just addressed the original sender and included the subject, would be better than nothing. Can't at least that be made possible right away?
Of course, it would be MUCH better if the message content could be included in that reply to the original sender. That is the solution that maybe ought to be the aim, hopefully, relatively soon. I encourage this solution, though, without knowing what is involved.
And then, it seems to me, the Cadillac solution would be a simple reply that would go to the original sender, with message content, but ALSO with the ability to add anyone else to your reply that you want.
The current "reply to all" ability, should, of course, be kept. Let's not lose that ability.
But please, let's not let the perfect solution get in the way of some kind of solution that is better than the present situation.
Having said all of this, I do think that this module does work well for easily and quickly creating group discussions, and I thank you for developing it.
Thanks,
GKC
Comment #16
sokrplare commentedSketching out an incremental phases plan based on reviews of Gmail and Facebook (which include all messages in same discussion thread - they don't spawn out separate threads which would be confusing):
Phase I - Reply (to author only)
Phase II - Reply to some
Phase III - Reply to any (down the road, not essential)
Comment #17
adamtong commentedi would like to see the implementation of this feature too!!!
Thank you.
Comment #18
gratefulsk commentedHas there been any progress on this? It's constantly confusing people using the messaging system.
Thanks
Comment #19
ivnish