CXO AI Content Editor provides editor-controlled AI rewriting suggestions
for selected plain-text content fields using Drupal AI's configured provider.

Editors generate a suggestion, review it, and choose whether to insert
or discard it. Content is saved through the normal content-editing form.

Administrators can select the allowed fields. The module includes
permission checks and entity and field access checks.

Project link

https://www.drupal.org/project/cxo_ai_content_editor

CommentFileSizeAuthor
Screenshot 2026-09-17 180124.png417.34 KBbalaji natarajan

Comments

balaji natarajan created an issue. See original summary.

balaji natarajan’s picture

Issue summary: View changes

I am applying for permission to opt projects into security advisory coverage.

Project:
https://www.drupal.org/project/cxo_ai_content_editor

Source code:
https://git.drupalcode.org/project/cxo_ai_content_editor

Branch for review: 1.x

CXO AI Content Editor provides editor-controlled AI rewriting suggestions
for selected plain-text content fields using Drupal AI's configured provider.

Editors generate a suggestion, review it, and choose whether to insert
or discard it. Content is saved through the normal content-editing form.

Administrators can select the allowed fields. The module includes
permission checks and entity and field access checks.

GitLab CI pipeline #966953 passed:
https://git.drupalcode.org/project/cxo_ai_content_editor/-/pipelines/966953

Manual checks of the editing workflow are underway. I am keeping this
application Active until the remaining permission checks are complete.

balaji natarajan’s picture

Status: Active » Needs review
balaji natarajan’s picture

Correction to my earlier description: this application is now marked Needs review. Manual permission checks remain in progress.

vishal.kadam’s picture

Issue summary: View changes
avpaderno’s picture

avpaderno’s picture

Thank you for applying!

Before giving links helpful to understand how the review process works, what to expect from a review, and what to do to avoid a review takes more time than needed, I would like to thank all the reviewers for the work they do.
These applications are volunters-driven, which also means it is not possible to predict when an application will be marked fixed and the applicant will get the permission to opt projects into security advisory policy. While we aim to make an application as quick as possible, it is also important for us that more people review the project used for an application. In this way, we make sure applications do not miss some important points that should be instead reported.
Applications are not meant to be complete debugging sessions that eliminate every existing bug, though. I apologize if sometimes applications seem to go into too-detailed reviews.

Please read Review process for security advisory coverage: What to expect for more details and Security advisory coverage application checklist to understand what reviewers look for. Tips for ensuring a smooth review gives some hints for a smoother review.

The important notes are the following.

  • If you have not done it yet, you should enable GitLab CI for the project and fix the PHP_CodeSniffer errors/warnings it reports.
  • For the time this application is open, only your commits are allowed.
  • The purpose of this application is giving you a new drupal.org role that allows you to opt projects into security advisory coverage, either projects you already created, or projects you will create. The project status will not be changed by this application; once this application is closed, you will be able to change the project status from Not covered to Opt into security advisory coverage. This is possible only 14 days after the project is created.

    Keep in mind that once the project is opted into security advisory coverage, only Security Team members may change coverage.
  • Only the person who created the application will get the permission to opt projects into security advisory coverage. No other person will get the same permission from the same application; that applies also to co-maintainers/maintainers of the project used for the application.
  • We only accept an application per user. If you change your mind about the project to use for this application, or it is necessary to use a different project for the application, please update the issue summary with the link to the correct project and the issue title with the project name and the branch to review.

To the reviewers

Please read How to review security advisory coverage applications, Application workflow, What to cover in an application review, and Tools to use for reviews.

The important notes are the following.

  • It is preferable to wait for a project moderator before posting the first comment on newly created applications. Project moderators will do some preliminary checks that are necessary before any change on the project files is suggested.
  • Reviewers should show the output of a CLI tool only once per application.
  • It may be best to have the applicant fix things before further review.

For new reviewers, I would also suggest to first read In which way the issue queue for coverage applications is different from other project queues.

balaji natarajan’s picture

Hi avpaderno,

Thank you for the guidance.

GitLab CI is enabled. Pipeline #966953 passed, including PHPCS:
https://git.drupalcode.org/project/cxo_ai_content_editor/-/pipelines/966953

The branch for review is 1.x. I will make the commits myself while
the application is open and address reviewer feedback.

The remaining manual permission checks are still in progress.

balaji natarajan’s picture

Hi avpaderno,

I Completed a manual permission visibility test using a non-administrator
Content editor account.

Without “Use CXO AI content suggestions,” the content remained editable
but AI suggestions buttons were absent. After granting the permission,
the buttons appeared on the allowed fields.

Direct endpoint access testing remains outstanding.

vishal.kadam’s picture

Status: Needs review » Needs work

1. FILE: cxo_ai_content_editor.module

For a new module that aims to be compatible with Drupal 10 and Drupal 11, I would rather implement hooks as class methods as described in Support for object oriented hook implementations using autowired services.

2. FILE: src/Form/ContentEditorSettingsForm.php

With Drupal 10 and Drupal 11, there is no longer need to use #default_value for each form element, when the parent class is ConfigFormBase: It is sufficient to use #config_target, as in the following code.

    $form['image_toolkit'] = [
      '#type' => 'radios',
      '#title' => $this->t('Select an image processing toolkit'),
      '#config_target' => 'system.image:toolkit',
      '#options' => [],
    ];

Using that code, it is no longer needed to save the configuration values in the form submission handler: The parent class will take care of that.

balaji natarajan’s picture

Status: Needs work » Needs review

Hi Vishal

Thank you for the review. I have addressed both points on branch 1.x.

1. Hook implementation:
Moved the form-alter logic into src/Hook/ContentEditorHooks.php using
#[Hook('form_alter')] and registered the class as an autowired service.

Retained a small procedural bridge marked #[LegacyHook] for Drupal 10
and Drupal 11.0 compatibility, following the linked change record.

2. Settings form:
Replaced explicit #default_value assignments with #config_target.
Removed the custom submitForm() implementation so ConfigFormBase
handles saving. ConfigTarget transformations preserve the checkbox
list, boolean, and integer values.

Added regression tests for configuration loading/saving and access
checks through both hook entry points. Local PHPCS, PHPStan, and
16 unit tests passed. AI suggestion generation was also verified
on the local Drupal site.

Latest pipeline:
https://git.drupalcode.org/project/cxo_ai_content_editor/-/pipelines/971125

Please review the updated implementation. Thank you.

balaji natarajan’s picture

Hi Vishal and reviewers, I’m following up on the changes I posted above. The application is marked Needs review, and branch 1.x is ready for another look. Please let me know if anything else needs to be addressed. Thank you for your time.

vishal.kadam’s picture

Rest seems fine to me.

Please wait for other reviewers and Project Moderator to take a look and if everything goes fine, you will get the role.