Needs work
Project:
Drupal.org security advisory coverage applications
Component:
module
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Task
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
30 Aug 2026 at 05:52 UTC
Updated:
14 Sep 2026 at 20:49 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent
Comments
Comment #2
vishal.kadamComment #3
avpadernoThank you for applying!
Before giving links helpful to understand how the review process works, what to expect from a review, and what to do to avoid a review takes more time than needed, I would like to thank all the reviewers for the work they do.
These applications are volunters-driven, which also means it is not possible to predict when an application will be marked fixed and the applicant will get the permission to opt projects into security advisory policy. While we aim to make an application as quick as possible, it is also important for us that more people review the project used for an application. In this way, we make sure applications do not miss some important points that should be instead reported.
Applications are not meant to be complete debugging sessions that eliminate every existing bug, though. I apologize if sometimes applications seem to go into too-detailed reviews.
Please read Review process for security advisory coverage: What to expect for more details and Security advisory coverage application checklist to understand what reviewers look for. Tips for ensuring a smooth review gives some hints for a smoother review.
The important notes are the following.
Keep in mind that once the project is opted into security advisory coverage, only Security Team members may change coverage.
To the reviewers
Please read How to review security advisory coverage applications, Application workflow, What to cover in an application review, and Tools to use for reviews.
The important notes are the following.
For new reviewers, I would also suggest to first read In which way the issue queue for coverage applications is different from other project queues.
Comment #4
vishal.kadam1. FILE: README.md
The README file is missing the required sections - Requirements, Installation and Configuration.
2. FILE: vidyard.module
For a module that aims to be compatible with Drupal 10 and Drupal 11, I would rather implement hooks as class methods as described in Support for object oriented hook implementations using autowired services.
3. FILE: src/Plugin/media/Source/Vidyard.php
Projects that are compatible with Drupal 10 or higher versions should use attributes instead of annotations.
Comment #5
arrowThanks for the review. I've fixed the issues you pointed out; the README sections, OO hooks, and plugin attributes are on the 2.x branch.
Comment #6
pedroromán commentedReviewed 2.x at a2be701.
src/VidyardUuid.php
Any first path segment on any vidyard.com host is taken as a player UUID:
https://www.vidyard.com/pricingyieldspricing, andmediaViewAlter()then renders animgpointing athttps://play.vidyard.com/pricing.jpg. Restrict the hosts to the player ones (play, share, embed, *.hubs) or the id to the UUID shape Vidyard uses.src/Hook/VidyardHooks.php
The loop over the display components stops after the first field that has the setting, so a media type with two oEmbed fields using the v4 player gets it on one of them only.
Class properties use lowerCamelCase (
$entityTypeManager); a promoted parameter is a property.composer.json
drupal.org packaging derives the core constraint from
core_version_requirementin the info file; declaringdrupal/corein the project's composer.json is not necessary and the two can disagree. With no other dependency, the composer.json can be removed.phpstan.neon
The GitLab template uses the project's phpstan.neon when it exists, so this file lowers the pipeline to level 0 and hides what the default level would report. Either remove it or raise the level.
.dev/composer.json, .dev/phpunit.xml.dist, .lando.yml
Local development tooling that ends up in the packaged release. If it has to stay in the repository, mark it
export-ignorein.gitattributesso the tarball does not ship it.README.md
"This GitHub repository is a mirror of git.drupalcode.org/project/vidyard" is text written for GitHub; on drupal.org it reads as if the project lived elsewhere. The Local development section belongs in a CONTRIBUTING file rather than in the README that ends up on the project page.
AI-Generated: Yes (AI tools helped with this review; I checked each point myself.)
Comment #7
cmlaraThe default level for gitlab_templates is 0.
https://git.drupalcode.org/project/gitlab_templates/-/blob/cc3ce7dae32e0...
Keeping the tested level in the project is industry common practice.