Closed (fixed)
Project:
Drupal.org security advisory coverage applications
Component:
module
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Task
Assigned:
Reporter:
Created:
9 May 2026 at 23:19 UTC
Updated:
25 May 2026 at 13:00 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent
Comments
Comment #2
avpadernoThank you for applying!
Before giving links helpful to understand how the review process works, what to expect from a review, and what to do to avoid a review takes more time than needed, I would like to thank all the reviewers for the work they do.
These applications are volunters-driven, which also means it is not possible to predict when an application will be marked fixed and the applicant will get the permission to opt projects into security advisory policy. While we aim to make an application as quick as possible, it is also important for us that more people review the project used for an application. In this way, we make sure applications do not miss some important points that should be instead reported.
Applications are not meant to be complete debugging sessions that eliminate every existing bug, though. I apologize if sometimes applications seem to go into too-detailed reviews.
Please read Review process for security advisory coverage: What to expect for more details and Security advisory coverage application checklist to understand what reviewers look for. Tips for ensuring a smooth review gives some hints for a smoother review.
The important notes are the following.
Keep in mind that once the project is opted into security advisory coverage, only Security Team members may change coverage.
To the reviewers
Please read How to review security advisory coverage applications, Application workflow, What to cover in an application review, and Tools to use for reviews.
The important notes are the following.
For new reviewers, I would also suggest to first read In which way the issue queue for coverage applications is different from other project queues.
Comment #3
avpadernoRemember to change status, when the project is ready to be reviewed. In this queue, projects are only reviewed when the status is Needs review.
Comment #4
vishal.kadamComment #5
avpadernoComment #6
boulaffasae commentedHi @avpaderno , Hi @vishalkadam
I committed new fixes for ESLint, Stylelint, and ESLint errors.
Thank you for the recommendations.
Comment #7
vishal.kadam1. Add a README.md file
The project is missing a README.md file, it should follow the template suggested in README.md template.
2. FILE: src/Plugin/Block/ParagraphsComponentsBlock.php
Projects that are compatible with Drupal 10 or higher versions should use attributes instead of annotations.
Comment #8
boulaffasae commentedHi @vishalkadam
I added a README.md, thank you for your suggetions
Comment #9
avpadernosrc/Plugin/Block/ParagraphsComponentsBlock.php
src/Form/ParagraphsComponentsForm.php
Code compatible with latest Drupal releases should use property promotion.
Comment #10
avpadernoThank you for your contribution and for your patience with the review process!
I am going to update your account so you can opt into security advisory coverage any project you create, including the projects you already created.
These are some recommended readings to help you with maintainership:
You can find more contributors chatting on Slack or IRC in #drupal-contribute. So, come hang out and stay involved!
Anyone is welcome to participate in the review process. Please consider reviewing other projects that are pending review. I encourage you to learn more about that process and join the group of reviewers.
I thank also all the reviewers for helping with these applications.
Comment #11
avpaderno