Comments

webchick created an issue. See original summary.

penyaskito’s picture

penyaskito’s picture

I wrote https://www.drupal.org/project/site_moderators/issues/3543970#comment-16... before, but even more relevant here:

We should be welcoming people that come back. In the spirit of Producing OSS Dormant committers chapter:

If the main criterion for granting commit access is good judgement, then why assume someone's judgement would deteriorate just because she's been away from the project for a while? Even if she completely vanishes for years, not looking at the code or following development discussions, when she reappears she'll know how out of touch she is, and act accordingly. You trusted her judgement before, so why not trust it always? If high school diplomas do not expire, then commit access certainly shouldn't.

We never removed webchick from core committers (and we shouldn't!). Why would we keep trust on them but not their blog?

webchick’s picture

Thank you so much for vouching for me! :)

This has actually started to become more of a blocker as I've become more and more involved in major Drupal AI initiatives and have things I need to get the word out about.

I ended up putting https://webchick.tech/toward-a-shared-eval-infrastructure-for-drupal-ai-... on my non-Drupal blog as a result, which is unfortunate. ;(

Please let me know what is needed to get reinstated. :)

avpaderno’s picture

Assigned: Unassigned » avpaderno
Status: Active » Fixed

I added the feed to Planet Drupal (https://www.drupal.org/aggregator/sources/2112).

Now that this issue is closed, review the contribution record.

As a contributor, attribute any organization that helped you, or if you volunteered your own time.

Maintainers, credit people who helped resolve this issue.

webchick’s picture

Oh, amazing! Thank you so much! :D

Status: Fixed » Closed (fixed)

Automatically closed - issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.