This meeting takes place every Friday at 14:00 UTC (currently 6:00am PT, 9:00am ET). See Time.is to see what that is in your timezone.
The meetings are held using Zoom, and a link is posted in the #ux Slack channel 10 minutes before the meeting. Agenda is first come, first serve and set by attendees. Use the Needs usability review issue tag for issues that need review and/or suggest issues in comments here.
List of Slack users to ping 10 minutes before the meeting:
@worldlinemine, @lauriii, @AaronMcHale, @anmolgoyal74, @Ravi, @shaal, @ckrina, @simohell, @Quynh, @yoroy, @Regu.pl, @the_g_bomb, @sahil, @Pallavi Singh
This list gets copied to the issue for the next meeting. If that has already happened, then go to that issue to add/remove yourself to/from the list.
Recording of this week's meeting: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JKzih7-X6CU
Rough transcript of this week's meeting: Drupal Usability Meeting - 2026-03-20.txt
We discussed the following issue:
NR and RTBC issues marked Needs usability review.
The group is actively tracking progress on these issues:
- #2860419: [Meta] Appearance page is too long and confusing
- #2985168: [PP-1] Allow media items to be edited in a modal when using the field widget with notes:
- @AaronMcHale: Issue could use some guidance.
In comment #109 the issue was marked as postponed for needing input from UX, accessibility and media initiative. Apparently there are some outstanding UX/accessibility questions (but I'm not sure what they are). This was echoed in comment #111.
Comment #144 is asking what is needed to move the issue along (the postponed state seems to be causing some delays/confusion as to how to proceed).
Perhaps we can at least take a look at what the issue is doing and provide some recommendations/guidance on how it could be implemented. - For an overall summary of the problem space see the videos in #3534039: Drupal Usability Meeting 2025-07-11 and #3535491: Drupal Usability Meeting 2025-07-18
- @AaronMcHale: Issue could use some guidance.
- #2704931: Provide Drupal root path on file system admin form
- #3163197: Allow hiding configured blocks in layout builder
- #2916876: Add visibility control conditions to blocks within Layout Builder
- #3247064: Error message presented when a BrokenPostRequestException is fired on AJAX submission can be misleading
- #3262935: Link field validation constraints don't give enough detail
Remaining tasks
-
Add issue credits for the participants. -
Add the issue(s) we discussed to the issue summary and as related issues. -
Add a rough transcript. -
Add a link to the recording on YouTube. -
Comment on the issue(s) we discussed.
| Comment | File | Size | Author |
|---|---|---|---|
| #8 | Drupal Usability Meeting - 2026-03-20.txt | 62.94 KB | benjifisher |
Comments
Comment #2
benjifisherComment #3
benjifisherComment #4
rkolleradded a few points about content moderation in general we've touched today. feel free to add as well as update the list in the issue summary. the points are in no particular order yet.
Comment #5
rkollerComment #6
benjifisherThis is the behavior of the Navigation module. IMO, it should be under the control of the theme, not any module. For now, it is still possible to uninstall
navigationand installtoolbar. You can even install the contribadmin_toolbar.This seems like such a serious bug that I think we have to understand it before considering the related problems. But it seems to be a known bug when both
content_moderationandworkspacesare enabled: #3541380: Node edit form always uses published revision when using content_moderation and workspaces. (I keep looking atworkflows, which is required forcontent_moderation, and misreading it asworkspaces.)If you want to see differences between revisions, then you can install the contrib Diff module.
Comment #7
rkollerin the admin ui the navigation module shouldnt interfere in the first place. those local tasks are strictly speaking navigation and not CTAs. i understand the step in the front end for theming purposes but in the backend not the best idea. plus everything is cramped into that "more actions" list. that list is in the upper right corner of the screen. if you have a large widescreen like me and pull browser windows wide, your focus is on the node edit form and then your focus / eyes have to move a long way to the upper right corner. while if the local tasks would still be shown they would be right underneath the h1, plus they would provide direct context in which section of a node a user currently is.
i think most likely the node edit form showing the published version instead of the revision while workspaces is enabled is a different bug than the pressing the "set as current revision" on forward revision again triggering a confirmation form for another revert.
no this point wasnt necessarily about the diff (i've mentioned the diff only as an additional useful information). but when you are on a node edit form it lacks context, am I on the default, a forward or a past revision? and in case one is on a forward revision something like a toggle button for displaying the default version alongside to illustrate the changes in context (that was the reason why I've added the detail about diff). but as i said first of all it is important to provide the context on what type of revision i am on. at the moment the only information available is that this is a revision (and revisions are required), when the node was last saved, and the current state and the select element to choose which state to switch the node to. but it lacks more context
and was it by accident or intentional that you removed the collection of potential issues section in the issue summary and removed the del tags from the point about granted issue credits and the issue discussed?
Comment #8
benjifisherComment #9
rkollerfixed the broken link in the issue summary pointing to the transcript
Comment #10
rkollerComment #11
benjifisherComment #12
rkollerI'll readd the points for direct reference to this comment:
Collection of potential issues
admin/contentare missing Revisions as an option - the applies toadmin/content/moderatedas well. The user has to go press the edit button for a node and within the node edit form press the more actions button to get to the revision local itemset as current revisionis doing the same as theRevertbutton. for forward revision revert shoulnd't be used but publish should be used instead directlyhttps://www.drupal.org/project/drupal/issues/3371457
admin/content/moderatedthat need the attention of the currently logged in user. The differentiation between "overview" and "moderated content" is also tricky. In the first meeting we discussed this MR we solely stayed on the "overview" secondary local task and missed the "moderated content"Comment #13
rkollercomment with the summary of the meeting at: #2906568-120: Provide users with the option to select an appropriate moderation state when reverting to a previous revision