Project: https://www.drupal.org/project/videojs
Problem/Motivation
I have just created #3577815: [10.x] Prepare 10.x branch for Video.js 10 implementation and wanted to ask officially if you need a co-maintainer for implementing the latest version of Video.js. Happy to help here!
Comments
Comment #2
anybodyThe DROWL.de team is also interested, feel free to contact me or @grevil or @thomas.frobieter. Let's push things forward!
(If needed we can create a separate issue for that)
Comment #3
anybodyComment #4
avpadernoComment #5
euk commentedInterestingly enough, our own fork has a few enhancements: we have the player working with the Videojs v.7 as that provides some useful features and allows us to make it 508/WCAG compliant, as well as helps tracking in-player events. If I remember correctly, moving to a higher Videojs version was blocking some of those features. Regardless, the enhancements we currently have:
- Dynamic library definition based on the selection of a locally hosted or CDN library
- Added config page
- Added permissions
- Added constraints
Not crazily a lot, but I am currently re-basing the form on top of the latest version and could produce a useful patch for review.
Comment #6
anybody@yannickoo we'd also like to push forward the v10 integration in a 4.x branch. Would you maybe move this over to Drupal.org project ownership (2209259) project?
Only you may do this as the requesting person.
I won't open a separate maintainership offer request now, but our offer still stands, if you should become maintainer soon. Then let's push v10! :)
Comment #7
yannickoo@anybody I have contacted all of the four maintainers on the Drupal Slack, let's wait before we escalate this 😇
Let's try everything to bring the player topic in Drupal to the next level 🚀
Comment #8
avpadernoAs a side note, only two people have the Admin maintainers permission, but only one of them logged in at least once less than 365 days ago.
Comment #9
yannickooThanks for letting us know Alberto 👌
Comment #10
anybodyThank you VERY much for pushing this forward @yannickoo - this is important! Did you get any feedback so far?
Comment #11
anybody@yannickoo looking at the maintainers inactivity here, it might make sense to request maintainership and not only co-maintainership here so you'd be able to administer other (co-)maintainers.
Comment #12
anybody@yannickoo I think it might be time to move this over?
Comment #13
anybodyFYI I opened another maintainership issue for us: #3615889: Offering to maintain Video.js (HTML5 Video Player)
Comment #14
_shyHi @yannickoo!
Thanks for the application. I added you as a maintainer!
@anybody, I'll come back to you in a separate ticket.
Comment #16
_shy