Closed (fixed)
Project:
Drupal.org content
Component:
Planet Drupal
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Task
Assigned:
Reporter:
Created:
19 Sep 2025 at 14:24 UTC
Updated:
6 Oct 2025 at 16:34 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent, Most recent file
My site, theaccidentalcoder.com (The Accidental Coder) had been feeding Drupal Planet. In doing a site makeover, I discovered there was an issue with the feed format I was producing. After fixing it, I saw my latest post was not appearing in Drupal Planet, and in looking at the sites that feed it, I discovered that my site was no longer listed. Please add it back in. The URL is https://theaccidentalcoder.com/planet-drupal/feed.
| Comment | File | Size | Author |
|---|---|---|---|
| #2 | 0144d7c6cae5d127421d96fe61baf391e5620d7c.png | 157.29 KB | avpaderno |
Comments
Comment #2
avpadernoThe feed passes validation; there are also at least two articles posted in the last three months and three weeks.
The code is not correctly rendered: It is formatted without new lines, making it difficult to read it.
Despite what that sentence says (as shown in Figure 4), what follows is text.
Comment #3
avpadernoComment #4
j. ayen green commentedHi. Thanks for the feedback. There were two issues that are now resolved:
1. The feed was not set to provide only Summary Or Trimmed of the body (code should never have been fed)
2. The W3C validator was showing stale data (the feed is set to not show anything prior to 2025). I gave the validator a dummy query string and it is providing the correct output now.
Comment #5
j. ayen green commentedI take that back. Apparently the validator continues to show stale data UNLESS a random query string is provided. Checking on it...
Comment #6
avpadernoI apologize I was not clear: I checked the article directly on the site; the screenshot I attached to my previous comment has been taken from the site.
Comment #7
j. ayen green commentedAh! No worries. Yeah, the code block handling met a head-on train, it seems. It should all look MUCH better now!
Comment #8
avpadernoThere are some debugging comments which make the feed fail validation.
Comment #9
j. ayen green commentedOops. Twig debug is now off. Thanks.
Comment #10
avpadernoThe feed validation is still catching the old revision. I checked the feed and the articles from the site; all is working as expected. I love how the code is rendered on the page!
I will add the feed when I return to my computer (between an hour, less or more).
Comment #11
avpadernoI added the feed to Planet Drupal (https://www.drupal.org/aggregator/sources/2103).
Comment #13
j. ayen green commentedThanks! I appreciate your patience.
I’m dumbfounded by the validator using its own cache.
Comment #14
avpadernoI did not expect that either. I can understand they could try to avoid DDOS attacks, but people using the service should be warned that results are cached.
Knowing the result are cached, I will now use more validation services.