Closed (duplicate)
Project:
Experience Builder
Version:
0.x-dev
Component:
Component sources
Priority:
Major
Category:
Task
Assigned:
Unassigned
Issue tags:
Reporter:
Created:
1 May 2025 at 09:33 UTC
Updated:
21 May 2025 at 11:21 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent
Comments
Comment #2
wim leersI think this is a duplicate of #3470422: Handle components provided by ComponentSources IMPLICITLY disappearing: gracefulness when developing SDCs: SDCs may appear/disappear from one request to the next? Or would you like to close that one in favor of this?
Comment #3
wim leersHm, let's keep the other one; it has history of how to work around it and shows the pain @kristen pol and others had to go through 😅
P.S.: #3464036: Component config entity should validate that the SDC actually (still) exists kinda already helps!
Comment #4
wim leers#3519168: Handle components provided by ComponentSources EXPLICITLY disappearing — enables deleting JS components that are in use might solve most of this.
Comment #6
wim leersAFAICT #3519168: Handle components provided by ComponentSources EXPLICITLY disappearing — enables deleting JS components that are in use did fix this, and
SingleDirectoryComponentTest::testFallbackadded sufficient test coverage.@f.mazeikis, can you confirm? 🙏
Comment #7
wim leersComment #8
f.mazeikis commentedThis issue is redundant and focus should be on #3470422.
Pretty sure @larowlan was supposed to push commit b4211966 to a branch on that issue, however by some mistake it ended up on a branch in this issue (#3519168 comment #45). We can close this one in favour of #3470422 and move the commit when/if relevant.
Comment #9
wim leersPerfect, thanks!