Closed (fixed)
Project:
Rebuild Cache Access
Version:
8.x-1.x-dev
Component:
User interface
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Feature request
Assigned:
Unassigned
Issue tags:
Reporter:
Created:
2 Nov 2023 at 09:14 UTC
Updated:
4 May 2026 at 15:36 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent, Most recent file


Comments
Comment #2
norman.lolComment #5
scott_euser commentedGiven that Gin is now Drupal CMS + Navigation & Top bar are in place, these actions are typically more suitable now within the Navigation.
This MR creates a block but could use someone to style it to match navigation.
Steps to install:
There is probably some way to install it automatically but not sure how and probably best as a follow-up.
Here is how it looks now with the MR:
Comment #6
scott_euser commentedComment #7
scott_euser commentedActually could just leverage the Navigation module:
Custom icon could be a potential follow-up too, but think its not worth being a blocker.
Comment #8
norman.lolAh you can just add blocks into the new navbar, okay.
Yeah, we would need to find a ways this gets placed automatically.
@scott – What do you mean with this:
Comment #9
norman.lolComment #10
scott_euser commentedThis commit essentially https://git.drupalcode.org/project/rebuild_cache_access/-/merge_requests... - no css needed in the end, it just takes the styling from Navigation module defaults so less maintenance burden also if they change things
Comment #11
scott_euser commentedYeah the problem with placing the block is we need to check if navigation is installed, but also need to react if it's not yet installed and later gets installed. I'll see if I can spend a bit more time on this to see how to do that
Comment #12
scott_euser commentedOkay that now handles:
I think this needs a new 2.x to make this Drupal 11+ only
Comment #13
scott_euser commentedFeedback from @AstonVictor addressed btw, back to ready for review. Updated the issue summary to make it more clear
Comment #14
scott_euser commentedComment #15
scott_euser commentedAdded test coverage now as well; @normal.lol anything else you feel you need to help get this over the line?
Note that php next major warning is the existing test coverage missing #[RunTestsInSeparateProcesses], but didn't want to add any scope creep
Comment #17
norman.lolThank you, Scott! Very well written and thorough piece of work 🤩 Merged ✅
Gets released in a sec.
Comment #19
scott_euser commentedThank you!
Comment #21
norman.lol