Convert README.txt to README.md

I have checked the "MR !1" file extension updated.

After

-Features:
+## Features:

The colon after the header name is not necessary.

The copyright notice at the end of the file should probably be removed too. README files hosted on drupal.org don't generally show any copyright notice.

Removed Colon and copyright in latest commit.

The updated "README.md" looks fine to me.

1. Hi, is this a big problem? I created README.txt because this is the default format suggested by D.O. site when creating a new repository. See, for example, admin_toolbar, auto_login_url, field_group module and hundreds of others.

2. As for the copyright notice - you can see the Maintainers section with the authors in almost every module's README.txt . This is a common practice, and I follow this practice.

Please do not create solutions to these "overwhelming" problems.

@Andrew The list of maintainers isn't a copyright notice. In code licensed under GPLv2+, the copyright is probably hold also by all the users who contributed code with patches, not by a single user.

As for using a README.txt file instead of a README.md file, the Drupal coding standards says that every documentation file should have a .txt extension. The Markdown format that should be used is still discussed, and the Drupal coding standards don't describe which format should be used.
It's up to the maintainers, IMO, the decision of which format to use. It just happens that, now that Drupal.org uses Gitlab for its Git repositories, a README.md file is automatically rendered when users watch it on the repository.

Still need Some changes ill work on those

Please check once below Attachment
Thanks

Fixed in 1.0.5.

@Bhanu951,

I'm giving credits for the patching critical bugs, valuable new functionality, or significant documentation updates. You made almost nothing; the mass README renaming on D.O is a sort of "rating cheating", IMHO. This way the credits are devalued.

@Andrew Agree with @Bhanu951
For the below issues, you should give credits to both the person. (Who give the patch and Who tested that patch)
https://www.drupal.org/project/modules_info/issues/3318709
https://www.drupal.org/project/modules_info/issues/3318711
https://www.drupal.org/project/modules_info/issues/3318595

@Bhanu951 @Shyam_Bhatt I wrote in every separate issue my opinion to every contribution. Hope this helps.
I think that crediting is a sort of "reward" for those who maintain the modules and not "a must" but "may" be gived to you and anyone who will post any comments, fixes and so on.