Problem/Motivation
This is a follow-up issue from #2999491: Add reusable option to inline block creation, specifically #2999491-88: Add reusable option to inline block creation (as requested in #2999491-97: Add reusable option to inline block creation):
...It might be a good idea to have a follow-up issue to decide how to choose when adding a new block.
Should we add an option to fork a reusable block to a non-reusable inline-block (and optionally delete the reusable block IF it's not used elsewhere?
Steps to reproduce
@tbd
Proposed resolution
@tbd
Remaining tasks
@tbd
User interface changes
@tbd
API changes
@tbd
Data model changes
@tbd
Release notes snippet
@tbd
| Comment | File | Size | Author |
|---|---|---|---|
| #4 | fork-blocks.png | 43.96 KB | luke.leber |
Comments
Comment #2
WebbehComment #4
luke.leberHuge +1, but I think that adding a delete option may slow things down a bit.
Very rough attempt at something like this! Probably riddled with gotchas and short-sightedness, but I wanted to continue to conversation!