Closed (fixed)
Project:
Drupal.org security advisory coverage applications
Component:
module
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Task
Assigned:
Reporter:
Created:
4 Aug 2022 at 09:00 UTC
Updated:
29 Sep 2022 at 14:54 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent
Comments
Comment #2
fabsgugu commentedComment #3
avpadernoIt appears there are multiple project applications created using your account.
Since a successful completion of the project application process results in the applicant being granted the vetted role, there is no need to take multiple applications through the process. Once the first application has been successfully approved, the applicant can promote other projects without review. Because of this, posting multiple applications is not necessary, and results in additional workload for reviewers, which in turn results in longer wait times for everyone in the queue. With this in mind, your secondary applications have been marked as Closed (duplicate), with only one application left open.
If you prefer that we proceed through this review process with a different application, then feel free to close the application left open as a duplicate, and re-open one of the project applications which had been closed.
Comment #4
fabsgugu commentedOk, I reopen this one and close the other one.
Comment #5
fabsgugu commentedComment #6
avpadernoThank you for applying! Reviewers will review the project files, describing what needs to be changed.
Please read Review process for security advisory coverage: What to expect for more details and Security advisory coverage application checklist to understand what reviewers look for. Tips for ensuring a smooth review gives some hints for a smother review.
To reviewers: Please read How to review security advisory coverage applications, What to cover in an application review, and Drupal.org security advisory coverage application workflow.
Since the project is being used for this application, for the time this application is open, only the user who created the application can commit code.
Comment #7
anairamzapHi
Automated Checks
For the drupal-check you could add an inline variable type declaration comment, like
Manual Checks
entity_reference_finder.moduleand since the min php version supported by Drupal is 7.4 I don't think the code in .module file is really needed. Even for latest Drupal 8 (even if D8 has reached EOL now) the min php version is 7.3. If I'm missing something here, please let me know.entity_reference_finder.routing.ymlfile there is a hard-coded reference tofrfrench. I don't think this is needed.Comment #8
fabsgugu commentedHello,
Thanks for the review !
I have made the requested changes. I added an image and completed the documentation.
Comment #9
anairamzapAutomated Review
All issues were resolved in latest dev version. Thanks :)
Manual Review
All suggestions covered.
Just a really minor thing (sorry for not noting this before!):
README.txtie: capital letters. Just a matter of changing the filename case.Once that's done I'll set the issue to Reviewed so an administrator can take a look.
Thanks,
m
Comment #10
fabsgugu commentedThanks, i made the changes.
Comment #11
anairamzapSetting as Reviewed as all Manual and Automated checks are OK.
Now an administrator should verify.
Thanks!
m
Comment #12
avpadernoComment #13
avpadernocore_version_requirementrequires Drupal 8.7.7, while semantic versioning requires Drupal 8.8.3, as previous Drupal versions don't handle it.Since this project is using semantic versioning, the requirements for Drupal 8 should be changed. Since Drupal 8 isn't supported anymore, I would rather declare the project compatible with Drupal 9 and Drupal 10, if there aren't Drupal 8 sites using this project.
Comment #14
avpadernoThank you for your contribution! I am going to update your account.
These are some recommended readings to help with excellent maintainership:
You can find more contributors chatting on the Slack #contribute channel. So, come hang out and stay involved.
Thank you, also, for your patience with the review process.
Anyone is welcome to participate in the review process. Please consider reviewing other projects that are pending review. I encourage you to learn more about that process and join the group of reviewers.
I thank all the reviewers too.
Comment #15
avpaderno