Closed (fixed)
Project:
Drupal.org security advisory coverage applications
Component:
module
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Task
Assigned:
Reporter:
Created:
3 May 2022 at 23:55 UTC
Updated:
26 Jun 2022 at 12:39 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent
Comments
Comment #2
avpadernoThank you for applying!
Remember to change status, as the currently used one means the project is not yet ready to be reviewed.
Is the account used to create this application a shared account?
Comment #3
ambient.impact@apaderno Whoops, fixed. 😅 This account is my own personal account, so not a shared account.
Comment #4
LuongGiap commentedHi @Ambient.Impact
I review Drupal coding standards for branch 1.x. You can check and fix errors.
Comment #5
ambient.impact@LuongGiap I just pushed a bunch of changes to the 1.x branch so you should be able to re-run
phpcs. I also added aphpcs.xmlto the repository with a few overrides, along with comments explaining why:./vendor/bin/phpcs --standard=web/modules/contrib/rebuilder/phpcs.xmlIf you look through my code, you'll see it's very well documented and follows the spirit of the coding standards, even though it diverges on a few sniffs.
Comment #6
LuongGiap commentedHi @Ambient.Impact
I was check code, thank you!
Comment #7
cmlaraComment #5 I believe needs a more experienced reviewers approval so placing this comment with bold text to ensure an approved reviewer sees this when parsing the history.
The policy as I understand it is that a project can not be failed on code-sniffs except for 'total disregard'. The reason for disabling appears to be around an opinion on readability and not a technical requirement to do so.
Is disabling sniffs without a technical justification classified as 'total disregard' of the coding standards?
Comment #8
ambient.impact@LuongGiap Thanks!
@cmlara Thanks for the thoughtful reply. Ultimately it's up to reviewers to decide this, but I feel that my code follows the spirit of the guidelines:
My code is very readable, with almost all of my deviations from the coding standards (relatively minor as they are) for better readability as you mention. See the phpcs.xml comments for my reasoning.
Comment #9
avpadernoThank you for your contribution! I am going to update your account.
These are some recommended readings to help with excellent maintainership:
You can find more contributors chatting on the IRC #drupal-contribute channel. So, come hang out and stay involved.
Thank you, also, for your patience with the review process.
Anyone is welcome to participate in the review process. Please consider reviewing other projects that are pending review. I encourage you to learn more about that process and join the group of reviewers.
Thank you to all the reviewers.
Comment #10
ambient.impact@apaderno Awesome, thanks! 🚀