Problem/Motivation

This will probably be a 5.3.x target, but there's no branch open for that, yet.

@e0ipso rightly pointed out in Slack that we should remove the implicit and password grant types per https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-oauth-security-topics

These individual changes address basically the same over-arching question: Should we implement the BCP document? I think the answer is "yes."

This would involve auditing the BCP draft (currently at -19) and making appropriate changes. This would include things like requiring PKCE, for instance.

Steps to reproduce

Proposed resolution

Remaining tasks

User interface changes

API changes

Data model changes

Comments

bradjones1 created an issue. See original summary.

wim leers’s picture

Related issues: +#3262023: [Plan] for 2.0.x

  • bojan_dev committed 9b3fefd on 6.0.x
    Enhanced/updated consumer entity
    
    • Migrated settings to the consumer...
bojan_dev’s picture

Version: 5.2.x-dev » 6.0.x-dev
Status: Active » Fixed

Status: Fixed » Closed (fixed)

Automatically closed - issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.