Closed (won't fix)
Project:
Documentation
Component:
Correction/Clarification
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Task
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
30 Mar 2021 at 11:07 UTC
Updated:
28 Mar 2025 at 12:04 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent
https://www.drupal.org/node/132202
Page was last edited in 2014, contains outdated permission, and does not even mention Drupal 8 or Drupal 9.
It is still in the legacy documentation system.
Migrate it to the new documentation system.
Revise it to reflect the permissions of currently supported version of Drupal.
Comments
Comment #2
quietone commentedMigrate to where?
Comment #3
avpadernoComment #4
avpadernoIsn't that outdated documentation? That page says This page documents the permissions that core modules expose in Drupal 6.
Comment #5
quietone commented@avpaderno, yes I know it is for an unsupported version. The question is still valid. The page can be migrated and updated to a supported version.
Comment #6
avpadernoI apologize: I was trying to understand what this issue was suggesting. It first says there are no references to Drupal 8 and Drupal 9, but then says the page is part of the legacy documentation.
If it is legacy documentation, I would leave it as it is.
I would not update it for Drupal 10/11: Knowing all the Drupal core permissions does not help neither administrators, who can get a list of Drupal core permissions from the page to set permissions, nor does it help from the security point of view, as that page reports which permissions should be carefully assigned to roles.
It is true that permissions do not normally change that much, but with the lately deprecated core modules, and the newly added experimental modules, permissions an administrator can assign effectively change more than in the past.
Comment #7
avpadernoThat page was useful for Drupal 6 because
hook_perm()implementations do not return a description for each permission. That changed in Drupal 7, though.Comment #8
quietone commented@avpaderno, thanks for the extra info. Since you say that 'permissions an administrator can assign effectively change more than in the past', I think this should be a won't fix. It really isn't sustainable to maintain a list like this in the wiki.
I am closing as won't fix.
Comment #9
avpaderno