This meeting takes place every Friday at 10:00am ET (7:00am PT, currently 15:00 UTC). See Time.is to see what that is in your timezone.

The meetings are held using Zoom, and a link is posted in the #ux Slack channel 10 minutes before the meeting. Agenda is first come, first serve and set by attendees. Use the Needs usability review issue tag for issues that need review and/or suggest issues in comments here.

Recording of this week's meeting: https://youtu.be/L78XQ9s2Ql0
We discussed the following issues:

NR and RTBC issues marked Needs usability review.

Comments

benjifisher created an issue. See original summary.

lauriii’s picture

matroskeen’s picture

Hey guys,

If you have time, please have a quick look at this one: #3190826: Show all selected modules on install confirmation form.
It's not ready for complete review yet, because the tests are failed, but it would be great to know if it makes sense for you.

Thanks :)

benjifisher’s picture

@Matroskeen:

Please update that issue to NW.

In the old workflow, the procedure was to move an issue from Active to NR when uploading a patch. Then a failed test would set it back to NW. I hope that the MR workflow will automate this: opening a MR should set the status to NR. For now, we have to do it manually.

matroskeen’s picture

Done, thanks! I also added "Needs usability review", hopefully, it's fine.

jhodgdon’s picture

#479708: Rename 'Authenticated user' and 'anonymous user' so they are clearer would be good to discuss. We need to figure out better names for the anonymous/authenticated roles. A short brainstorming session would be helpful! Issue has been open since 2009.

jhodgdon’s picture

Here's an interesting one that just came up, about deciding what order to sort the list of blocks for Configuration Translation:
#3191144: Configuration translation: list of blocks to translate should be sorted

benjifisher’s picture

@jhodgdon:

I am restoring the parent issue.

I agree that it is odd to have each week's issue be a child of the previous one, and it is an accidental result of using the "clone issue" link. However, it is convenient to have links between the issues. I often search for the meeting where we discussed something or other. If I do not have the actual issue, then I sometimes resort to clicking through the parent/child links.

jhodgdon’s picture

Ah, sorry about that!

benjifisher credited shaal.

benjifisher’s picture

benjifisher’s picture

benjifisher’s picture

Issue summary: View changes
Status: Active » Fixed

Status: Fixed » Closed (fixed)

Automatically closed - issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.