Closed (fixed)
Project:
Drupal.org site moderators
Component:
Other
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Support request
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
23 Mar 2019 at 14:01 UTC
Updated:
14 May 2020 at 13:54 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent
As custodians of the Drupal.org project namespace, I would like to get some feedback from the webmasters regarding this issue #3042550: Code standards issue: The decrypt function.
Will be acceptable to "grab" the currently unused namespace for a dummy "Decrypt" project? ("Solution 1" in the related issue.)
The project would be sandbox only implementing hook_help() explaining why it exists.
The motivation for doing so is:
Or is "grabbing" a project namespace with no intention of creating a "real" project outside community norms?
Comments
Comment #2
avpadernoIf the purpose is avoiding a user creates a module where a function has a name that is equal to the project machine name, that would eventually be a problem for every project using a verb as machine name, not just for a Decrypt project somebody could create.
Given the problem is not with the namespace, but the content of a module, and given the "issue" would involve many project names, we cannot take any proactive action, nor take it for a very specific case that is a single case out of many possible cases.
Comment #3
avpadernoI spoke of projects that use a verb as machine name, but that could also be true for projects using a noun as machine name, or a combination of verb and noun, like spam, cookies, send_email, encrypt_file.
Comment #4
avpadernoComment #5
avpadernoComment #6
avpaderno