Support for Drupal 7 is ending on 5 January 2025—it’s time to migrate to Drupal 10! Learn about the many benefits of Drupal 10 and find migration tools in our resource center.
Problem/Motivation
The Recipe Category Taxonomy has no description. We should put some words here to indicate what it is for.
Note whilst Ingredients and Recipe Cuisine also have no description, they also have no terms and consensus is for them to be removed under #2990611: Remove empty taxonomies from Umami Demo, so we don't need to add a description for them here.
Proposed resolution
Add a description.
Remaining tasks
- Decide on description.
- Add description.
User interface changes
None.
API changes
None.
Data model changes
None.
Comment | File | Size | Author |
---|---|---|---|
#9 | Vocabulary description.png | 18.52 KB | volkswagenchick |
#8 | recipe-taxonomy-description-d8.patch | 599 bytes | MaddieC |
#5 | Taxonomy | Umami Food Magazine 2018-08-12 15-28-41.jpg | 296.07 KB | pazhyn |
#2 | recipe-category-desc-2991563-2.patch | 609 bytes | captainpants |
Taxonomy___Umami_Food_Magazine.png | 231.43 KB | Eli-T |
Comments
Comment #2
captainpants CreditAttribution: captainpants as a volunteer commentedHere's a go at a decent description.
Comment #3
captainpants CreditAttribution: captainpants as a volunteer commentedComment #4
captainpants CreditAttribution: captainpants as a volunteer commentedComment #5
pazhyn CreditAttribution: pazhyn as a volunteer and at AnyforSoft, Drupal Ukraine Community for AnyforSoft commentedApplied patch locally and it looks ok.
Attaching screenshot.
Comment #6
Eli-TThanks for working on this!
I don't think we should add examples this description. The user can easily click list terms to see the actual terms, which serve as better examples. If the nature of the terms changes, we don't have to implement the change in both places (eg if we implemented #2991577: Pluralise taxonomy terms in Umami's Recipe Category vocabulary).
Also I don't think the categories are the best way to serve a recipe, necessarily - they are just what the recipes are for. An accompaniment isn't the best way of serving chili sauce - it's the only way. So maybe at the cost of being less descriptive but more accurate, we could just describe this taxonomy as something like the type of recipe?
Comment #7
MaddieC CreditAttribution: MaddieC at Softescu commentedComment #8
MaddieC CreditAttribution: MaddieC at Softescu commentedComment #9
volkswagenchickPatch spun up using the Umami profile on simplytest.me.
I navigated to /admin/structure/taxonomy.
Description is short and sweet and show in the UI. Screenshot attached.
Thanks!! Marking RTBC
Comment #10
Eli-TRTBC +1
Comment #12
lauriiiCommitted b489195 and pushed to 8.7.x. Also cherry-picked to 8.6.x. Thanks!