Problem/Motivation

Something I noticed while reviewing #2831943: Use "rendered media" (not links) as default media field formatter; add modal to configure the used media view mode and #2934162: Provide better defaults to media form displays:

When you add a new field to article nodes, by default, it ends up below the comment field:

This is almost never what the user will want, and can lead to confusion when the new field's data seems to be "lost". The site builder can of course rearrange the field on the manage display tab, but since comment fields will probably always belong toward the end of content, we should probably provide better defaults.

Proposed resolution

  • Discuss whether comment fields should be heavier by default, so that new fields are displayed above them rather than below them by default.
  • At a minimum, adjust the comment field weights in Standard?

Remaining tasks

Discuss!

User interface changes

New fields appear above the comment field by default.

API changes

Probably not.

Data model changes

Maybe some changes to shipped config, but no upgrade path. (Sites, not modules, own config, so we don't know if they ordered things this way on purpose or not.)

Comments

xjm created an issue. See original summary.

Version: 8.5.x-dev » 8.6.x-dev

Drupal 8.5.0-alpha1 will be released the week of January 17, 2018, which means new developments and disruptive changes should now be targeted against the 8.6.x-dev branch. For more information see the Drupal 8 minor version schedule and the Allowed changes during the Drupal 8 release cycle.

Version: 8.6.x-dev » 8.7.x-dev

Drupal 8.6.0-alpha1 will be released the week of July 16, 2018, which means new developments and disruptive changes should now be targeted against the 8.7.x-dev branch. For more information see the Drupal 8 minor version schedule and the Allowed changes during the Drupal 8 release cycle.

Version: 8.7.x-dev » 8.8.x-dev

Drupal 8.7.0-alpha1 will be released the week of March 11, 2019, which means new developments and disruptive changes should now be targeted against the 8.8.x-dev branch. For more information see the Drupal 8 minor version schedule and the Allowed changes during the Drupal 8 release cycle.

Version: 8.8.x-dev » 8.9.x-dev

Drupal 8.8.0-alpha1 will be released the week of October 14th, 2019, which means new developments and disruptive changes should now be targeted against the 8.9.x-dev branch. (Any changes to 8.9.x will also be committed to 9.0.x in preparation for Drupal 9’s release, but some changes like significant feature additions will be deferred to 9.1.x.). For more information see the Drupal 8 and 9 minor version schedule and the Allowed changes during the Drupal 8 and 9 release cycles.

Version: 8.9.x-dev » 9.1.x-dev

Drupal 8.9.0-beta1 was released on March 20, 2020. 8.9.x is the final, long-term support (LTS) minor release of Drupal 8, which means new developments and disruptive changes should now be targeted against the 9.1.x-dev branch. For more information see the Drupal 8 and 9 minor version schedule and the Allowed changes during the Drupal 8 and 9 release cycles.

Version: 9.1.x-dev » 9.2.x-dev

Drupal 9.1.0-alpha1 will be released the week of October 19, 2020, which means new developments and disruptive changes should now be targeted for the 9.2.x-dev branch. For more information see the Drupal 9 minor version schedule and the Allowed changes during the Drupal 9 release cycle.

Version: 9.2.x-dev » 9.3.x-dev

Drupal 9.2.0-alpha1 will be released the week of May 3, 2021, which means new developments and disruptive changes should now be targeted for the 9.3.x-dev branch. For more information see the Drupal core minor version schedule and the Allowed changes during the Drupal core release cycle.

Version: 9.3.x-dev » 9.4.x-dev

Drupal 9.3.0-rc1 was released on November 26, 2021, which means new developments and disruptive changes should now be targeted for the 9.4.x-dev branch. For more information see the Drupal core minor version schedule and the Allowed changes during the Drupal core release cycle.

Version: 9.4.x-dev » 9.5.x-dev

Drupal 9.4.0-alpha1 was released on May 6, 2022, which means new developments and disruptive changes should now be targeted for the 9.5.x-dev branch. For more information see the Drupal core minor version schedule and the Allowed changes during the Drupal core release cycle.

Version: 9.5.x-dev » 10.1.x-dev

Drupal 9.5.0-beta2 and Drupal 10.0.0-beta2 were released on September 29, 2022, which means new developments and disruptive changes should now be targeted for the 10.1.x-dev branch. For more information see the Drupal core minor version schedule and the Allowed changes during the Drupal core release cycle.

Version: 10.1.x-dev » 11.x-dev

Drupal core is moving towards using a “main” branch. As an interim step, a new 11.x branch has been opened, as Drupal.org infrastructure cannot currently fully support a branch named main. New developments and disruptive changes should now be targeted for the 11.x branch, which currently accepts only minor-version allowed changes. For more information, see the Drupal core minor version schedule and the Allowed changes during the Drupal core release cycle.

luke.stewart’s picture

Category: Bug report » Feature request
Issue tags: +Bug Smash Initiative

This is the Bug Smash Initiative target of the day.

There has been no discussion recorded on the above in the last few years. This is more of a feature request so tagging as such but even so I think this could be marked closed won't fix if there is no engagement in the next 3 months.

eelkeblok’s picture

StatusFileSize
new34.51 KB

Reading this, I wonder whether it would make sense to put new fields at the top regardless of the field type, *or* not automatically put it in the the display at all. I've had countless times that I added a field that was not meant to show up on the frontend at all and forgot to remove it from the default display. One semi-popular workaround for this problem I've seen used is to basically not use the default display and always explicitly configure view modes. In fact, the field not being added to other displays than the default also feels a little arbitrary.

Basically what I'm saying is, maybe there is an opportunity to improve the UX/DX around this. Another option, that I actually like a lot, when I think about it, could be a dialog that asks the user in which displays they want to add the field (I guess the default for the top/bottom choice should be bottom.. that would probably also serve as a mitigation for the problem this issue was opened for).

A mockup of a UI for a dialog asking a user to add a new field to displays.

Version: 11.x-dev » main

Drupal core is now using the main branch as the primary development branch. New developments and disruptive changes should now be targeted to the main branch.

Read more in the announcement.