Closed (fixed)
Project:
Drupal core
Version:
9.0.x-dev
Component:
other
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Task
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
25 Mar 2017 at 20:02 UTC
Updated:
5 Nov 2019 at 19:54 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent
The 9.x branch of core is just a placeholder to allow project_issue to display it in the version selector. However, contributors are occasionally confused by the existence of the 9.x branch. See, for example, #2863957: Drupal 9.x installation doesn't work properly.
Replace 9.x with only a README file.
git ls-files -z | xargs -0 git rm| Comment | File | Size | Author |
|---|---|---|---|
| README.txt | 216 bytes | xjm |
Comments
Comment #2
alexpottSo when we start developing Drupal 9 we'd:
Comment #3
cilefen commentedgit ls-files -z | xargs -0 git rmworks better if the working copy has any untracked files.Comment #4
cilefen commentedRe #2 why 10.x not 10.0.x?
Comment #5
alexpott@cilefen because if we make the placeholder branch 10.0.x then we have to force delete it when in comes time to branch 9.x.x to open the 10.0.x branch - which messes with git history.
Comment #6
cilefen commentedOh, exactly, I get it now.
Comment #7
chi commentedI wonder if removing all files from the branch and then pushing them again at some point will have much impact on overall size of the repository.
Comment #8
djalxs commentedThis shouldn't have much of an effect on repository size, compared to the size it already is.
I would say this needs to be done pretty much immediately, as I myself have just installed using the 9.x branch and was confused as to why 9.x looks more like 7.x than 8.x does and why it has so much functionality missing.
At what point will we have a working 9.0.x dev branch? I'm quite enthusiastic to contribute to be honest.
Comment #9
djalxs commentedThe mind also boggled at why that disgusting 'Overlay' module was back.
Urrrgh.
Comment #10
cilefen commented@djalxs I am glad you are enthusiastic. There is much still to innovate in Drupal 8—please help there. I understand the confusion to a degree, however, I am not aware of anything on drupal.org indicating that development on Drupal 9 has begun. Some related reading:
Comment #11
xjm9.0.x will be branched in about seven days, so there's no longer any value in doing anything with the legacy 9.x branch. Retitling accordingly, and moving to (hopefully) the correct infra queue. This issue is postponed on 9.0.x opening and a bulk update happening to move the 9.x issues to 9.0.x.
Comment #12
gábor hojtsy#3087223: Bulk update 8.7.x & 8.8.x Drupal core issues for 8.9.x AND 9.0.x! migrated all the 9.x issues to 9.0.x. I don't believe there is anything else left to postpone this on? I will not do the branch removal myself though to make sure to check with all respective parties that it is a go!
People are getting confused, such as
Comment #13
gábor hojtsyAlso there is apparently no 9.x tarball / release anymore, just the branch.
Comment #14
drummI deleted the release shortly after issue migration, so no issues got back to the 9.x version.
Go ahead and push deletion of the
9.xbranch whenever you’d like, or let me know if I should take care of that.Comment #15
xjmI pushed the 9.x branch deletion earlier today. Thanks everyone!