Problem/Motivation
The "Filter" button on the on the URL alias page is marked as a primary button (displayed in blue in Bartik). This is inconsistent with the mark-up of filter buttons on other pages such as the Content page, and also defeats the purpose of separating primary call-to-actions (in this case Add alias) from others.
Proposed resolution
Turn the link into a normal button instead of a primary button by changing the CSS class.
Remaining tasks
Turn the link into a normal button instead of a primary button by changing the CSS class.
User interface changes
This is a UI change that improves usability by providing consistency and visual hierarchy.
API changes
Data model changes
Comment | File | Size | Author |
---|---|---|---|
#7 | 2752149-7.patch | 516 bytes | pashupathi nath gajawada |
#3 | screenshot-d8-2 nightingale 2016-06-21 11-17-02.png | 15.38 KB | ifrik |
#2 | remove-primary-class-from-filter-button-2752149-2.patch | 516 bytes | marcoscano |
Comments
Comment #2
marcoscanoIs it ok just to remove the #button_type property?
Comment #3
ifrikThanks marcoscano,
removing the button_type property works as required and the "Filter" button is now displayed as a normal (grey) button.
Comment #4
tkoleary CreditAttribution: tkoleary commentedLooks great! As an erstwhile admin module maintainer this was always a thorn in my side.
Comment #6
pguillard CreditAttribution: pguillard commentedRe-testing cause I guess the bot got crazy
Comment #7
pashupathi nath gajawada CreditAttribution: pashupathi nath gajawada as a volunteer and at Melity commentedUploading the same patch,
As to find why the tests failed.
Comment #9
ifrikpashupathi nath gajawada,
Please do not rename existing patches. This is really disrespectful to the person who did the actual work.
As you can see, pguillard simply send his patch for testing again, and it passed.
Setting this to RTBC again because the original patch is #2 passed and was already RTBC'ed.
Comment #10
ifrikComment #11
alexpottCommitted 440b828 and pushed to 8.2.x. Thanks!
@pashupathi nath gajawada I didn't credit you because the patch didn't need a reroll and retesting doesn't require another patch.
Comment #14
Gábor HojtsyThanks, removing from UX sprint now.