It would be a really nice feature if the block visibility could be defined (just as in block settings). What do you think?

Comments

katbailey’s picture

katbailey CreditAttribution: katbailey commented

Hmm, I'm not sure what you mean. You mean if you had a block as a tab within a QT block that tab would only show up according to that block's visibility settings?

Pasqualle’s picture

Pasqualle
Location 🇭🇺 Budapest
CreditAttribution: Pasqualle commented
Title: Block visibility » Tabpage visibility settings
Version: 6.x-1.x-dev » 6.x-2.x-dev

I think you mean tabpage visibility

Pasqualle’s picture

Pasqualle
Location 🇭🇺 Budapest
CreditAttribution: Pasqualle commented
Version: 6.x-2.x-dev » 6.x-3.x-dev

Moving new features to 3.x version

Anonymous’s picture

Anonymous (not verified) CreditAttribution: Anonymous commented

Hi,

I'm not sure wether this is the right subject, but I think rapsli thinks of this:

QuickTabs should provide an option to recognize the visibility setting of an used block. For example, if you define a specific block like "who's online" to be visible only on the front page, this setting will be actually ignored by QuickTabs, if you use this block as part of QuickTab.

I hope this helps

Skirr’s picture

Skirr CreditAttribution: Skirr commented

Also visibility of some blocks depends on roles. And if this block is in QT, than some roles see just a tab without a block.

infojunkie’s picture

infojunkie
Location Vancouver
CreditAttribution: infojunkie commented

+1

1kenthomas’s picture

1kenthomas CreditAttribution: 1kenthomas commented
Version: 6.x-3.x-dev » 7.x-3.x-dev
Issue summary: View changes

Any progress? It's problematic to have blocks visible via QT, which are otherwise violating their visibility settings.

jukka792’s picture

jukka792 CreditAttribution: jukka792 as a volunteer commented

Any progress?

Currently, a block which is used in the quick tabs is respecting only the user role settings, but not the URL visibility settings.
This change should be done probably in the "QuickBlockContent.inc" -file ? Actually there is already similar function related to user role "accessBlock" but not related to block url settings.