Support for Drupal 7 is ending on 5 January 2025—it’s time to migrate to Drupal 10! Learn about the many benefits of Drupal 10 and find migration tools in our resource center.
Problem/Motivation
In SHS for Drupal 7 we had the possibility to add new terms directly in the widget. For D8 this is still missing.
Proposed resolution
Add the functionality to add new terms to SHS for Drupal 8.
Instead of creating a custom dialog we could use the core dialogs which are simple, clean and easy to extend.
Remaining tasks
* write code
* write tests
Comment | File | Size | Author |
---|---|---|---|
#70 | 66-70.diff | 14.28 KB | sinn |
#70 | shs-add_new_term_functionality-2712115-70.patch | 18.34 KB | sinn |
#66 | Create Pets _ Pets (1).png | 13.99 KB | shashank5563 |
#53 | 2712115-53-add-new-terms-functionality.patch | 17.96 KB | nikathone |
#39 | shs-add-new-terms-functionality.patch | 14.14 KB | csedax90 |
Issue fork shs-2712115
Show commands
Start within a Git clone of the project using the version control instructions.
Or, if you do not have SSH keys set up on git.drupalcode.org:
Comments
Comment #2
kriboogh CreditAttribution: kriboogh at Calibrate commentedWe needed this for our current project so I implemented a possible solution. With the patch below it is possible to create items on the fly, inline. So no popup occurs (see screenshots).
Due to time limitations on our project, I'm not able to write tests for this.
Also note that maybe extra security stuff needs te be put in place since adding the new term is now exposed as a ajax url !
Comment #3
stBorchertUhm, the diff doesn't look as it has been built on top of the latest git commit. It seems to contain all code from SHS.
Could you please create a new patch containing your changes only?
See https://www.drupal.org/node/1054616 for a guide.
Comment #4
kriboogh CreditAttribution: kriboogh at Calibrate commentedAh, sorry about that. I updated the file.
Comment #5
stBorchertThanks for the patch, I'll do an in-depth review when I'm back from my vacation ;)
Quick review without further testing:
Better not rely on a field that may be there (or not) ... passing the language as a setting would be cleaner IMHO.
Why "en" as default language and not
LanguageInterface::LANGCODE_NOT_SPECIFIED
?This should be something like "edit terms in {vocabulary}" or (even better) a custom permission callback which may be overridden on a per field base.
You've enabled "allow creating new levels" in the patch but this option is never used in the code?
Comment #6
kriboogh CreditAttribution: kriboogh at Calibrate commentedPatch updated, now includes crsf control on the ajax call and updated using a custom permission to check if user has rights to create a term in the vocabulary.
The "allow creating new levels" is used in the javascript to hide the widgets.
Comment #7
kriboogh CreditAttribution: kriboogh at Calibrate commentedUpdated to latest dev release (September 9th)
Comment #8
NWOM CreditAttribution: NWOM commentedThanks for #7! I successfully applied it without problems. However, I noticed one potential bug. When disabling "allow creating new levels", terms on the first (and only) level cannot be created either. I tested this when no terms were added to a vocab. Is this behavior intentional?
Edit: I noticed two additional issues while testing it. One issue is that sometimes when creating a new term, the term is not shown until the page refreshes. Also, if you have two fields that reference the same taxonomy vocab, create a term, and assign it; the second field will not show the new term until a refresh has occurred.
Comment #9
kriboogh CreditAttribution: kriboogh at Calibrate commentedBehavior is not intentional, so I guess at a first level you should be allowed to create terms. Other issues you describe is something I didn't test so those are bugs as well.
Unless someone else likes to picks this up, I will look into this later on, as we don't need this behavior at the moment in our project, and time is really tight; so I can't spent time on this.
Comment #10
nicholas.alipaz CreditAttribution: nicholas.alipaz commentedThe only issue I am finding is that after creating a term it does not automatically select the term upon creation. This causes end-user confusion from UX perspective.
Comment #11
bmcclure CreditAttribution: bmcclure as a volunteer and at Top Floor commentedI may resolve this if I need that particular behavior to work in the meantime as well, but I'm pretty sure this patch is working well enough for my use case on my current project, and it's certainly an improvement over not having the option at all!
Update: I'm noticing the issue of the new term not being auto-selected as well. That's a more important issue to solve IMO as far as UX is concerned, and I may submit a patch shortly if I find time to solve it before someone else does.
Comment #12
bmcclure CreditAttribution: bmcclure as a volunteer and at Top Floor commentedI've discovered that it's this patch which causes some very wonky behavior involving Inline Entity Forms (I think).
I'm using Commerce, which uses IEF to manage product variations. I'm also using Entity Browser on several fields both on the product and the product variation (though this issue exists even with entity_browser uninstalled).
With this patch for SHS applied, this behavior starts happening:
1. Trying to open an entity browser from within the product variation (the IEF reference field) opens the wrong entity browser from a field on the parent product.
2. Disabling the entity browsers from the parent product field then causes the entity browsers from the variation to just not open or do anything at all.
2. Clicking Edit on a product variation and then clicking Cancel causes the entire Variations field to disappear from the edit form until the page is refreshed.
It seems like AJAX requests related to IEF are where the problem is coming from with this patch applied, but I don't know for sure why yet.
Comment #13
SakaSerbia CreditAttribution: SakaSerbia commentedOne question. I install 8.x-1.x-dev from 2016-Sep-09. Is this patch add to last version or no?
For me its look like there si no function create new items http://prntscr.com/ddfpml
EDIT: I install patch and for me its look that all work good. If I see some issue I would write..
Comment #14
nicholas.alipaz CreditAttribution: nicholas.alipaz commentedThe November 30th code changes broke the patch and it no longer applies cleanly. Needs a re-roll.
Comment #15
kriboogh CreditAttribution: kriboogh at Calibrate commentedHere is a patch against the latest dev (nov 30th)
Note: None of the issues mentioned about have been addressed, this is just to apply the original patch to the latest dev.
@nicholas.alipaz when creating a new item, in my case it selects the new item automatically (using safari on mac OSX). Maybe this is browser related?
Comment #16
jeremdow CreditAttribution: jeremdow commentedThanks, kriboogh, can you re-roll one more time though at the original patch level?
Composer only checks p0-p2 levels deep, so this is failing to apply again for me.
Comment #17
jeremdow CreditAttribution: jeremdow commentedActually, never mind, here it is - thanks again.
Comment #18
jeremdow CreditAttribution: jeremdow commentedOops, try that again - not sure why it got truncated.
Comment #19
nicholas.alipaz CreditAttribution: nicholas.alipaz commentedThis patch is causing another ajax widget from paragraph to silently fail. Uninstalling this patched module restored my functionality. There are no log entries and nothing in my js console to indicate what is happening.
Comment #20
nicholas.alipaz CreditAttribution: nicholas.alipaz commentedReading through the patch I wonder if the fact it is disabling some form caching might be having an effect. The issue I am having is very similar to what bmcclure describes in #12.
Here is where I documented the issue I am having in paragraphs when this patch is applied.
Comment #21
kriboogh CreditAttribution: kriboogh at Calibrate commentedSmall fix we needed to get https working (patched against the latest dev 8.x-1.0-alpha2+2-dev)
Comment #22
nicholas.alipaz CreditAttribution: nicholas.alipaz commentedAs per #2833573: Clicking remove does not re-display the selection widget, I did confirm this patch to be the issue with a caching problem I had on multiple ajax driven widgets. Removing this patch fixed my issue on other form widgets.
Comment #23
stBorchertSide note: I would love to see the form extensible so a developer could easily add a language dropdown or some other fields necessary for the term generation.
And as a bonus: use a popover :)
Comment #24
Aparnag CreditAttribution: Aparnag commentedVery useful patch #7
Comment #25
rashad168 CreditAttribution: rashad168 commentedI tried to use #18 jeremdow patch with the last dev version (8.x-1.0-alpha2+11-dev) but I face this issue
- in my terminal when I apply the patch there is some file patching FAILED as you see below:
patching file js/models/WidgetModel.js
patching file js/views/AppView.js
patching file js/views/ContainerView.js
patching file js/views/WidgetView.js
patching file shs.module
Hunk #1 FAILED at 79.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file shs.module.rej
patching file shs.routing.yml
patching file src/Controller/ShsController.php
Hunk #1 FAILED at 2.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 77 (offset -3 lines).
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file src/Controller/ShsController.p hp.rej
patching file src/Plugin/Field/FieldWidget/OptionsShsWidget.php
Hunk #1 FAILED at 2.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 91 (offset 44 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 102 (offset 44 lines).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 145 (offset 44 lines).
Hunk #5 succeeded at 168 (offset 44 lines).
Hunk #6 FAILED at 143.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 195 (offset 38 lines).
Hunk #8 succeeded at 323 (offset 43 lines).
2 out of 8 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file src/Plugin/Field/FieldWidget/O ptionsShsWidget.php.rej
patching file modules/patched/shs.patch
- this failed patching file return an error message in the website as below:
The website encountered an unexpected error. Please try again later.
Recoverable fatal error: Argument 1 passed to Drupal\shs\Plugin\Field\FieldWidget\OptionsShsWidget::getOptions() must be an instance of Drupal\shs\Plugin\Field\FieldWidget\FieldableEntityInterface, instance of Drupal\node\Entity\Node given, called in C:\wamp\www\altamayoz\core\lib\Drupal\Core\Field\Plugin\Field\FieldWidget\OptionsSelectWidget.php on line 34 and defined in Drupal\shs\Plugin\Field\FieldWidget\OptionsShsWidget->getOptions() (line 335 of modules\shs\src\Plugin\Field\FieldWidget\OptionsShsWidget.php).
Drupal\shs\Plugin\Field\FieldWidget\OptionsShsWidget->getOptions(Object) (Line: 34)
Drupal\Core\Field\Plugin\Field\FieldWidget\OptionsSelectWidget->formElement(Object, 0, Array, Array, Object) (Line: 152)
Drupal\shs\Plugin\Field\FieldWidget\OptionsShsWidget->formElement(Object, 0, Array, Array, Object) (Line: 121)
Drupal\shs_chosen\Plugin\Field\FieldWidget\OptionsShsChosenWidget->formElement(Object, 0, Array, Array, Object) (Line: 322)
Drupal\Core\Field\WidgetBase->formSingleElement(Object, 0, Array, Array, Object) (Line: 85)
Drupal\Core\Field\WidgetBase->form(Object, Array, Object) (Line: 168)
Drupal\Core\Entity\Entity\EntityFormDisplay->buildForm(Object, Array, Object) (Line: 122)
Drupal\Core\Entity\ContentEntityForm->form(Array, Object) (Line: 113)
Drupal\node\NodeForm->form(Array, Object) (Line: 117)
Drupal\Core\Entity\EntityForm->buildForm(Array, Object)
call_user_func_array(Array, Array) (Line: 514)
Drupal\Core\Form\FormBuilder->retrieveForm('node_properties_form', Object) (Line: 271)
Drupal\Core\Form\FormBuilder->buildForm(Object, Object) (Line: 48)
Drupal\Core\Entity\EntityFormBuilder->getForm(Object) (Line: 113)
Drupal\node\Controller\NodeController->add(Object)
call_user_func_array(Array, Array) (Line: 123)
Drupal\Core\EventSubscriber\EarlyRenderingControllerWrapperSubscriber->Drupal\Core\EventSubscriber\{closure}() (Line: 576)
Drupal\Core\Render\Renderer->executeInRenderContext(Object, Object) (Line: 124)
Drupal\Core\EventSubscriber\EarlyRenderingControllerWrapperSubscriber->wrapControllerExecutionInRenderContext(Array, Array) (Line: 97)
Drupal\Core\EventSubscriber\EarlyRenderingControllerWrapperSubscriber->Drupal\Core\EventSubscriber\{closure}()
call_user_func_array(Object, Array) (Line: 153)
Symfony\Component\HttpKernel\HttpKernel->handleRaw(Object, 1) (Line: 68)
Symfony\Component\HttpKernel\HttpKernel->handle(Object, 1, 1) (Line: 57)
Drupal\Core\StackMiddleware\Session->handle(Object, 1, 1) (Line: 47)
Drupal\Core\StackMiddleware\KernelPreHandle->handle(Object, 1, 1) (Line: 99)
Drupal\page_cache\StackMiddleware\PageCache->pass(Object, 1, 1) (Line: 78)
Drupal\page_cache\StackMiddleware\PageCache->handle(Object, 1, 1) (Line: 47)
Drupal\Core\StackMiddleware\ReverseProxyMiddleware->handle(Object, 1, 1) (Line: 50)
Drupal\Core\StackMiddleware\NegotiationMiddleware->handle(Object, 1, 1) (Line: 23)
Stack\StackedHttpKernel->handle(Object, 1, 1) (Line: 657)
Drupal\Core\DrupalKernel->handle(Object) (Line: 19)
this patch can be applied to version (shs-8.x-1.0-alpha2) BUT this version conflict with many of other module like (inline entity form module), (field collection module) and also conflict with the image field when you try to upload multi image file it's save only 1 image.
so we need this PATCH to be apply to the last dev version (8.x-1.0-alpha2+11-dev) if it's possible
Comment #26
rashad168 CreditAttribution: rashad168 commentedafter some testing I fond that both shs version (shs-8.x-1.0-alpha2) and (8.x-1.0-alpha2+11-dev) are working found but without the (functionality to add new terms) and if we apply this PATCH the add new term functionality is working but make the shs module conflict with other modules like below:
- issue of image field with this patch:
when we upload multi image when we save the node only 1 image its view in that node
- issue of field collection module with this patch:
if we use field collection and we use unlimited item functionality we can't add more than 2 items and when we save the node only 1 item is saved the 2nd item disappear
- issue of inline entity form module with this patch:
if we try to add new node thru inline entity form field, the field not saved and disappear after we click the create node link
I could not figure out why this conflict behavior appear?
Comment #27
eme CreditAttribution: eme commentedIssue come from
If you delete this, you will get rid of strange errors. I did not get illegal choice errors for my part, but that may be occur in some cases (to be defined).
Comment #28
eme CreditAttribution: eme commentedAttached patch.
Comment #29
eme CreditAttribution: eme commentedSorry, well named patch.
Comment #30
kriboogh CreditAttribution: kriboogh at Calibrate commentedCan confirm that using #28, by removing the disableCache, we no longer get the illegal choice errors.
Comment #31
rashad168 CreditAttribution: rashad168 commentedyes, I tried #29 patch with version " 8.x-1.0-alpha2 " on two different site it's work fine thank you very much..
and I want to inform that #29 patch not compatible with 8.x-1.x-dev
Comment #32
mikejw CreditAttribution: mikejw at University of Adelaide commentedThe patch doesn't apply easily either using `git apply` or `patch -p1` - could you please create it using git (instead, I am assuming, using your IDE)? @eme
Comment #33
eme CreditAttribution: eme commentedCan you try with this one ?
Comment #34
mikejw CreditAttribution: mikejw at University of Adelaide commentedSadly that doesn't work either so I tried to hand patch what you have against the latest dev and I can see that it won't apply at all - for starters the shs.module has changed quite a bit. Ideally you need to be doing a git clone from the dev version, perhaps making a branch, make your changes in the new branch and then you can do something like `git diff 8.x-1.x > name-of-issue.patch`.
The version control page for the module covers it pretty well: https://www.drupal.org/project/shs/git-instructions
Comment #35
paulmckibbenI've hand-entered and rerolled the patch from #33 against the latest 8.x-1.x branch. However, it needs work: the user interface doesn't provide good feedback that the new term was created. That said, this is a good baseline from which to refine and improve. @eme, thanks for your work so far!
Comment #36
paulmckibbenAnother problem: when editing an existing entity, the field allows me to specify a new term even if I've specified that creating new terms is not allowed.
Comment #37
Anonymous (not verified) CreditAttribution: Anonymous as a volunteer commentedpaulmckibben, the patch in your comment #35 fails:
Upon selecting the appropriate field form display settings to make use of the modification, it produces an error when going to the "add content" page:
Report Log shows this:
Symfony\Component\Routing\Exception\RouteNotFoundException: Route "shs.create_term" does not exist. in Drupal\Core\Routing\RouteProvider->getRouteByName() (line 201 of /volume1/Web/website.com/core/lib/Drupal/Core/Routing/RouteProvider.php).
how did you get it working?
Comment #38
Anonymous (not verified) CreditAttribution: Anonymous as a volunteer commentedupon testing and getting this to "work" using the scripts and various versions (tested all patches and all alpha versions), I've come to the conclusion that the addition of new terms is not possible on the FIRST layer of a taxonomy vocabulary?
can anyone confirm?
the modification does not allow me to add any terms to the list if there is only one level of terms. the dialog box never pops up.
using the alpha2 version will not work on drupal 8.6, as it produces a "taxonomy_term_hierarchy' doesn't exist: " error in the error log.
so this feature seems to be dead in drupal 8 for anyone that decides to update.
shame. it's a much needed feature.
does anyone know of a similar module that has similar capabilities?
Comment #39
csedax90 CreditAttribution: csedax90 commentedI've merged #35 with latest dev and added some improvements... it is certainly not a nice and clean code but at least it works
I've solved a problem with multiple term selection and the disappearing issue when you select an empty select after the first render... I hope I have been helpful
Comment #40
csedax90 CreditAttribution: csedax90 commentedRerolled #35 + some improvements
Comment #41
balbogbf CreditAttribution: balbogbf commentedhi, i have the same problem of #37
an idea? tks a lot!
Comment #42
rwilson0429 CreditAttribution: rwilson0429 commentedThe patch in #40 applied cleanly but I'm still unable to add new terms from the node/add or node/edit screen.
However, I'm still not able to add new terms from the node/add or node/edit pages.
Comment #43
csedax90 CreditAttribution: csedax90 commentedtry the #39, I found some bugs with the #40 that I still have to solve
Comment #44
kars4 CreditAttribution: kars4 as a volunteer commentedHello,
I need let users to select or create hierarchical taxonomy terms if not exist in content add form.
SHS module providing the required functionality, but doesn't work in Drupal 8.7
Can anyone to fix it?
Thanks
Comment #45
coozila CreditAttribution: coozila commentedWill be nice to work!
Comment #46
phrk CreditAttribution: phrk commentedAs mentioned above and in 3067029, none of the patches work in Drupal >= 8.7 .
Comment #47
rwilson0429 CreditAttribution: rwilson0429 commented#39 works from me with a clean install of Drupal 8.8.2
Comment #48
sfuchsbe CreditAttribution: sfuchsbe as a volunteer commented@rwilson0429: don't know what you did different... I installed a fresh Drupal 8.8.5, enabled SHS 8.x-1.x-dev + patch #40.I used the existing entity reference field for the tags vocabulary in the article content type and set this to use SHS as form widget with adding new terms set to allowed. The field itself is by default configured to allow creation of new fields. When opening a node add or edit form the widget appears, I can select out of existing terms but there is no option present to add new terms.
When using #39 as mentioned in your post the entire widget is not appearing in the forms.
Probably you could explain more detailed what you were doing to be able to reproduce.
@sedax: probably you can double check #40. You mentioned you wanted to provide another update. Would highly appreciate any input. In parallel I'm going to double check as well.
I tried again and for some reason now #39 is working as expected. Don't know what went wrong the first time. So all good and just ignore my post ;)
Thank you
Comment #49
selpe CreditAttribution: selpe commentedThanks sedax...
Comment #50
Rar9 CreditAttribution: Rar9 commentedWill this still work for d9?
Comment #51
ShaneOnABike CreditAttribution: ShaneOnABike as a volunteer and at Bees on a Bike commentedI can confirm that #39 is working. Is it possible to roll this into the latest dev of make a new release?
Comment #52
nikathonePatch working with Drupal 9. Had to remove
entity.manager
and some other minor cleanup.Comment #53
nikathoneOops. Uploaded wrong patch file. Since this patch is adding a router the user will need to clear the cache before trying to add a term.
Comment #54
Summit CreditAttribution: Summit commentedHi,
I tried this patch on my dev environment. There it is working great.
Then I copy-paste the whole site, with the database to my production environment. There I do not see the function to add new terms.
And the options to add new terms are greyed out in the screen at admin/structure/types/manage/listing/form-display (see picture)
I also added the patch to save term lineage (https://www.drupal.org/project/shs/issues/2943357) , hopefully these two do not interfere. Unfortunately I do not see an error message.
But no possibility to add new terms on node edit page on my production site.
Using latest Drupal 8, and latest .dev version of SHS.
greetings,
Comment #55
d.sibaud CreditAttribution: d.sibaud commentedUnfortunately, after applying the patch the "Add new term" shows up also on views exposed filters and it is available for all the users without any regard to user permissions (however I don't expect to see it on views exposed filters at all).
Comment #56
Summit CreditAttribution: Summit commentedHi, It is on live site not working. Latest Alpha, this patch, and latest Drupal 8. Taxonomy not limited.
I can not select the option add new terms.
See attached image. Thanks for looking into this still. Would be great if this was working!
Greetings, Martijn
Comment #57
Summit CreditAttribution: Summit commentedHi,
Sorry, I can add select the option, but it is just not showing the "add new" within the term selection.
greetings, Martijn
Comment #58
ahurtado_20 CreditAttribution: ahurtado_20 commentedHi, I'm looking for help, when I try to create two SHS terms, the second one doesn't work, it doesn't save my webform, what can I do?
Comment #59
stBorchertMoving to new branch.
Note for anyone working on this: #2712115-23: Add functionality to add new terms ;)
Comment #60
Nick Hope CreditAttribution: Nick Hope commented#53 applies to 8.x-1.0-alpha5. I needed to do a
drush cr
(not just clear caches) to get it working.It does work, but unfortunately it enables new terms to be added for every term-reference field on the page, even if "Allow creating new items" is unchecked for some fields.
This patch #60 is a re-roll for 2.0.x-dev. It has the same problem as above, and also, if I save a media entity, without setting some non-required fields, I get the error "This value should be of the correct primitive type."
Regarding #55, I didn't see "Add new term" on any of my exposed filters. Maybe that refers to an older patch.(see #62)Comment #61
Nick Hope CreditAttribution: Nick Hope commentedComment #62
Nick Hope CreditAttribution: Nick Hope commentedJust an update to say that I did start seeing "Add new term" on my exposed filters, so that's still an issue.
Until that is fixed, the patch is still useful for administrators wanting to add a lot of media and a lot of taxonomy terms at the same time.
Comment #63
Summit CreditAttribution: Summit commentedHi, Could this great functionality be added to version 2.x also please for Drupal 9?
Thanks for this in advance!
greetings, Martijn
Comment #64
aiphesI need the ability to add terms on the fly on a D9.2.10 website and actually the option
is unavailable.
Both on 2.0dev and RC version.
Is this planned or scheduled for next months ?
Thanks
Comment #65
Summit CreditAttribution: Summit commentedHi, on RC1 with latest Drupal 9.3.0 I got error:
When I look into solutions, I think we have to move to .dev version.
Could this patch be altered as such it works on latest .dev?
Thanks a lot in advance,
greetings, Martijn
Comment #66
shashank5563 CreditAttribution: shashank5563 commented#60 I have made some minor changes in the patch and it working perfectly with 2.0.0-rc3 version in drupal 9.
Patch working with Drupal 9.
Comment #67
aiphesTrying to apply the patch and I get on Drupal 9.4.8 :
and when I try to edit a content which use the shs field:
Symfony\Component\Routing\Exception\RouteNotFoundException: Route "shs.create_term" does not exist. in Drupal\Core\Routing\RouteProvider->getRouteByName() (line 206 of core/lib/Drupal/Core/Routing/RouteProvider.php).
Comment #70
sinn CreditAttribution: sinn as a volunteer commentedI've updated the solution from #66 and created a merge request (attached patch is the latest version of the changes in MR):
- cleaned up a code a little bit.
- made the create_new_items setting processable in js (so you can enable/disable creation of the new items).
- implemented dependency injection.
- fixed langcode handling for term creation.
- removed input text field from views filter since term shouldn't be created on the views page.
Comment #71
abelass CreditAttribution: abelass commentedOn drupal 10.2 #patch70 allows me to select "Allow creating new items" and "Allow creating new levels" but I have no additional options in the node edit form
Comment #72
Summit CreditAttribution: Summit commentedHi Abelass, with this patch you can! I have let it build by a great company Drudesk.
https://www.drupal.org/project/shs/issues/3409930
greetings,
Comment #73
abelass CreditAttribution: abelass commentedThanks @Summit,
indeed it works with the 2 additional patches.
Comment #74
Summit CreditAttribution: Summit commentedYou are lucky, I waited 2 years for it...and then decided to let it build...
greetings and great weekend,
Comment #75
joseph.olstad@everyone above:
I just became maintainer of this project.
Which patches are needed?
Anyone willing to take the onus for RTBC and explain which patches are needed? I hear a report about 2 additional patches, which patches are those? 2 additional patches would tell me there's three patches, which three patches?
Can someone please clarify?
Comment #76
joseph.olstad#3409930-12: Save term lineage Drupal 10
Comment #78
joseph.olstadtook patch 66
Comment #80
joseph.olstadThis functionality introduced a bug as described by Hedn.
Here:
#3409930-15: Save term lineage Drupal 10
Parent issue:
#3436051: check term permissions to ensure that the add new term ui only shows up for those with those permissions
Comment #81
joseph.olstadThis bug was brought into 3.0.0-alpha1/alpha2