Is this module currently compatible with JW Player 7 (JW7)?
There is an official webinar coming up soon:
Thursday, August 13, 2015 1:00 PM EDT
https://goto.webcasts.com/starthere.jsp?ei=1073488
Seven Reasons to Use JW7
Thu, Aug 13, 2015 1:00 PM EDT
Please join us as we give an overview of all of the new features and benefits JW Player has included in JW7 -- our fastest, smartest, and most customizable player yet. JW7 was reengineered from the core API to the visual interface to provide the best online video experience no matter what device, browser, and rendering mode is used to play your content.
We will showcase JW7's:
- MPEG-DASH support
- Skins completely customizable with CSS
- Faster: loading -- 35% over JW6 --, video rendering, and development and integration
- Flash behind the scenes with a Javascript and HTML5-based player
- Updated embedding
Who Should Attend:
- Developers and Agencies
- Publishers and Broadcasters
- Advertisers and Ad Networks
- Marketers and Brands
Speaker:
Eric Boyd
Director of Product
JW Player
Comments
Comment #2
seutje commentedIt's version matching pattern fails miserably.
6 version fails in a whole different way
Comment #3
s_leu commentedHere's a first patch that introduces version 7 support and also fixes some out dated config for the cloud hosted player.
Comment #4
s_leu commentedFixed some typo in hook_update.
Comment #6
berdirCommitted, lets move this to 8.x-1.x now.
Comment #7
johnchqueAdded first version, also added tests.
Comment #8
berdirmake sure you have a newline at the end, or diff is unhappy.
almost correct, you just forgot to actually save the configuration changes at the end.
think about this more, I'm actually not sure that we need to care about storing a different key. You either use one or the other version. Lets just have a single player_key setting and use that.
jw_player_cloud_player_default as a name is a bit strange.
Lets just use exactly the same their UI, which is "Cloud Player Library Url". Both in the #title and the name (lowercased)
then we no longer need this.
Comment #9
johnchqueChanges made based on comment #8. Also extended the tests a bit.
Comment #10
berdirthe comment here is outdated, it isn't an account token anymore.
Comment #11
johnchqueSo true, also changed some other lines. :)
Comment #13
berdirIndeed. looks good now to me, committed and pushed.