css_browser_selector.js currently used by the Da Vinci project

A very small javascript library that allows you to create browser, platform, device, and even version specific CSS to be merged into your normal classes. No more hacks or mischievous code in your CSS.

The library (available via GitHub) uses the Creative Commons License NO compatible with GPLv2 and later.

Try Author create licence GPL or MIT.

Comments

btopro’s picture

Status: Active » Needs review

size / scope seem fine. Have we ever accepted CCL to the white list? I've never seen code / libraries licensed this way..

nesta_’s picture

Assigned: Unassigned » nesta_
Status: Needs review » Needs work

I'll try to add author GPL v2 license. This is used in a module that has included unused Libraries call but I do not think the right way. I'll try to add the license and make it my need Reviews.

Thanks mate!

kreynen’s picture

Creative Commons licenses aren't "compatible" with a GPLv2 license in the strictest sense of the word compatible. Not the way lax licenses like MIT and BSD are GPL compatible. While the new Drupal.org Licensing Working Group (LWG) is working on a draft to revise the 3rd party code and content policy to allow licenses like CC-BY-SA on content, I don't think we'd approve code with this license.

I've opened #2466167: Use of Creative Commons on code? in the LWG queue, but I don't think this can be whitelisted unless the license is changed.

nesta_’s picture

Issue summary: View changes
gisle’s picture

Status: Needs work » Needs review

CC BY is now listed as a GPL-friendly license on:
https://www.drupal.org/docs/develop/packaging-a-distribution/drupalorg-d...

Leave this with status "Needs review" for two weeks to allow for discussion, before deciding what to do with this request.

gisle’s picture

Assigned: nesta_ » Unassigned

Unassigning.

gisle’s picture

Component: Miscellaneous » Whitelist request

Changed component.

gisle’s picture

Assigned: Unassigned » gisle
Status: Needs review » Closed (won't fix)

It is time to make a call on this.

There has been no discussion, and CC BY is whitelisted for non-code assets only, not for code.
The case is very similar to Javascript available under GPL3 or Apache2.
We currently do not whitelist these.