eg for this user, who was blocked:

ADMIN DATE ROLE CHANGE USER
reasson Wed, 02/10/2013 - 16:58 authenticated user removed from deeson

There is a warped kind of logic... but IMHO it would be clearer to have something like ROLE: [blank], and CHANGE: "blocked".

Comments

greg.1.anderson’s picture

greg.1.anderson commented
Category: bug » feature

If a user is blocked, they lose the "authenticated user" role. The role watchdog table output shown is working as designed.

Perhaps someone can submit a patch that transforms the output as suggested.

adam_b’s picture

adam_b commented

Okay, I didn't realize that blocking a user removed the "authenticated user" role - that makes more sense now. Thanks.

Sorry to submit all these comments with no patches - but I'm not a developer, just a hack sitebuilder.

greg.1.anderson’s picture

greg.1.anderson commented

No problem on submitting a bunch of issues; sorry I don't have time to implement everything suggested.

greg.1.anderson’s picture

greg.1.anderson commented
Issue summary: View changes

clarified markup

gaurav.kapoor’s picture

gaurav.kapoor commented
Issue summary: View changes
Status: Active » Closed (outdated)