eg for this user, who was blocked:
| ADMIN | DATE | ROLE | CHANGE | USER |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| reasson | Wed, 02/10/2013 - 16:58 | authenticated user | removed from | deeson |
There is a warped kind of logic... but IMHO it would be clearer to have something like ROLE: [blank], and CHANGE: "blocked".
Comments
Comment #1
greg.1.anderson commentedIf a user is blocked, they lose the "authenticated user" role. The role watchdog table output shown is working as designed.
Perhaps someone can submit a patch that transforms the output as suggested.
Comment #2
adam_b commentedOkay, I didn't realize that blocking a user removed the "authenticated user" role - that makes more sense now. Thanks.
Sorry to submit all these comments with no patches - but I'm not a developer, just a hack sitebuilder.
Comment #3
greg.1.anderson commentedNo problem on submitting a bunch of issues; sorry I don't have time to implement everything suggested.
Comment #3.0
greg.1.anderson commentedclarified markup
Comment #4
gaurav.kapoor commented