Closed (fixed)
Project:
Frequently Asked Questions
Version:
5.x-2.6
Component:
User interface
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Support request
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
25 Dec 2007 at 15:24 UTC
Updated:
19 Feb 2008 at 11:53 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent file
Comments
Comment #1
nancydruI also see this problem in the Weight page.
Comment #2
stella commentedI don't think you need to configure the Glossary vocabulary for faq nodes in order for it to work. However, I have attached a patch that should overcome this problem in case people do associate terms with the FAQ node type without actually configuring the nodes themselves with the terms. I think this might also prevent the displaying of valid FAQ terms which have no associated nodes.
Cheers,
Stella
Comment #3
nancydruHa! It's always great to learn something about your own module by posting an issue for someone else! I wonder when I "fixed" this? So now you've given me two more documentation tasks to do - thanks. :(
The patch should be effective. And actually, I don't think FAQ has ever shown categories for which there were no nodes.
However, there has been stuff written about taxonomy's "count_nodes" having very poor performance. But it is easy to use and "protected" as part of core. I no longer use it if I can avoid it. I just do a COUNT query on the term_nodes table; this is much faster.
Comment #4
stella commentedComment #5
(not verified) commentedAutomatically closed -- issue fixed for two weeks with no activity.
Comment #6
stella commentedReleased in FAQ 5.x-2.7 and FAQ 6.x-1.3.
Cheers,
Stella