I constantly have trouble understanding this function so I wrote this. Maybe it needs to be in @return, maybe not, I am not sure.
| Comment | File | Size | Author |
|---|---|---|---|
| #7 | 1973762_7.patch | 727 bytes | chx |
| docs.patch | 667 bytes | chx |
I constantly have trouble understanding this function so I wrote this. Maybe it needs to be in @return, maybe not, I am not sure.
| Comment | File | Size | Author |
|---|---|---|---|
| #7 | 1973762_7.patch | 727 bytes | chx |
| docs.patch | 667 bytes | chx |
Comments
Comment #1
cosmicdreams commentedlooks good to me but you might want someone on the documentation team to review this. Is there anyway to test the syntax to see if it properly documents (perhaps using simplytest.me?)
Comment #2
chx commentedComment #3
yched commentedLooks good to me. Thanks !
Comment #4
chx commentedalso for D7.
Comment #5
alexpottThis one's for Jennifer.
Comment #6
jhodgdonI think the example does belong in the @return section, since it describes the return value (and when re-patching, don't leave blank lines within the @return). Thanks!
Comment #7
chx commentedComment #8
jhodgdonThanks! Committed to both 8.x and 7.x.
Comment #9.0
(not verified) commentedUpdated issue summary.