Closed (won't fix)
Project:
Drupal core
Version:
x.y.z
Component:
other
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Task
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
4 Jun 2003 at 21:00 UTC
Updated:
23 Jul 2004 at 17:31 UTC
I was editing the documentation for the cloud module. During the testing, I found several quirks that make administration of clouds confusing. Here's what I noticed:
Here's my recommended admin hierarchy for the cloud
module:
What do you all think?
Comments
Comment #1
al commentedPatched blogroll -> site cloud in latest CVS.
Still leaving this open because "site cloud" is somewhat confusing. It's a bit of a non-title - all of my users go "what's that?" when they first of all see it.
Please discuss what it should become within this bug report, so we can keep everything in one place.
Comment #2
joe lombardo commentedI also think Site Cloud is mis-leading. I figured there was some history to the name.
Here are some alternate names tha could be considered:
Site Monitor (could be misleading)
Related Sites
Monitor Sites
nothing great from me... maybe someone will pitch a better name.
Another big picture question... do people actually use this module? Would they if they understood it better?
Could this functionality be added to the weblinks module and this module be discarded? As part of the weblinks module, I could see admins having the ability to flag a site as one that needs to be monitored. It might be taxing to monitor all sites in a weblinks module.
Comment #3
flow commented> Project: Drupal
> Area: cloud.module
> Version: cvs
> Pstatus: Active
> Priority: 2
>
> 11/06/2003 - 09:20 : joe lombardo
> I also think Site Cloud is mis-leading. I figured there was some
> history to the name.
>
> Here are some alternate names tha could be considered:
> Site Monitor (could be misleading)
> Related Sites
> Monitor Sites
>
> nothing great from me... maybe someone will pitch a better name.
>
> Another big picture question... do people actually use this module?
I do and have been since the day one.
> Would they if they understood it better?
It's not that hard to figure out what it does. Agreed, a bit better
description might be helpful, but it's not like we're totally
obfuscating what the thing does at the moment.
> Could this functionality be added to the weblinks module and this
> module be discarded?
No.
I don't use weblinks and personally think they serve a quite different
purpose - therefor it's better to keep them separated.
-rbb
Comment #4
al commentedComment #5
bkessels commentedat 13:20 11-6-03 +0000, JL wrote:
Comment #6
al commentedChanging title (again) because of bug in project.module.
Comment #7
killes@www.drop.org commentedcloud.module was moved to contrib cvs and has been removed after nobody took over maintenance.