Title says it all; I have tested this and it seems we don't need this. So the current TODO is confirmed. I think this can go.
| Comment | File | Size | Author |
|---|---|---|---|
| admin_views.get_breadcrumbs.patch | 486 bytes | damiankloip |
Title says it all; I have tested this and it seems we don't need this. So the current TODO is confirmed. I think this can go.
| Comment | File | Size | Author |
|---|---|---|---|
| admin_views.get_breadcrumbs.patch | 486 bytes | damiankloip |
Comments
Comment #1
damiankloip commentedComment #2
sunIs the correct breadcrumb still displayed?
(Should we add a test for the breadcrumb? ;))
Comment #3
damiankloip commentedYep, I tested this. The breadcrumb is still displayed. I will look at a test now, they aren't my strongest attribute though :)
Comment #4
sunActually, scratch the tests.
Since the system display handler only replaces existing router paths, and because it's really only about the router item definition (not changing the link's title or other breadcrumbs-relevant properties), the regular breadcrumbs should totally work as usual.
Comment #5
damiankloip commentedok, that makes sense. Committed to 7.x
Comment #6
damiankloip commentedOops.