I all,
I'm using this fantastic module and I'm very satisfied about its potential.
But now I have some doubts:
- Is still necessary to use the core "image" field when the "file" field can manage also images with media module?
- What about the best practices once installed media module? I have to forget the core "image" field and manage all kinds of media with core "field" file?
- I'm asking this because I've noticed that the "Media file selector" is however available for the core "image" field: why?
- If i enable the "Media file selector" applied to a core "image" field it then allow me also to include any kinds of media in addition to images: is this a nonsense/ambiguity?
- To conclude: if core "image" field is still useful for something, when is better to use it instead of managing images with "file" field? Use cases?
Thanks to everyone who is able to dissolve these doubts
MXT
Comments
Comment #1
dave reidComment #2
mxtThank you very much for your answers!
All is more clear now, thanks!
Comment #3
dddave commentedI might add that a lot of responsive themes provide the correct html5 tags for imagefields out-of-the-box so that such images are responsive without further ado.