Closed (fixed)
Project:
Drupal.org content
Component:
Services listing
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Task
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
28 Feb 2012 at 08:18 UTC
Updated:
19 Jun 2014 at 13:10 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent
Happiness has been posted
Comments
Comment #1
dman commentedLooks very good to me.
+1 reviewed & endorsed.
I'll let a second opinion come along and call this issue 'fixed' if they agree.
Comment #2
alex ua commentedI marked #651238: Add Happiness (Sweden) to the Drupal Services list as a duplicate of this.
I'll add my +1 (fwiw- I'm not a webmaster, so I'm pretty sure my vote doesn't count) for Happiness, who have been trying to get listed for a long time and who seem to have continued to contribute.
Comment #3
Anonymous (not verified) commented+1 looks good, now needs webmaster to post!
Comment #4
dman commentedIs currently published and publicly listed in its chosen categories, eg http://drupal.org/drupal-services/all/all/all/Sweden
(not by me, but it has been done)
Comment #6
peter törnstrand commentedWhy does not the Happiness page have a nice URL-alias? All other listings in the marketplace for Sweden have nice URL:s :-(
Comment #7
dddave commentedAs a featured service provider you should get a nice alias too.
Do we provide these aliases by hand or is this automated and Happiness was somehow missed?
Comment #8
dsquaredb commentedThese aliases are not automatic. Looks like it wasn't done when promoted to Featured. I have changed the alias to /marketplace/happiness
While I don't disagree with Featured Provider, I don't see where this organization was reviewed for Featured before being promoted. Did I just miss it? If they weren't reviewed for Featured, is there some reason it was skipped?
Comment #9
dddave commentedThis was added to featured providers by lizzjoy on March, 27th. Sponsoring and contribution history are worth the featured position but I am curious what happened here.
Comment #10
dddave commented#2226341: Promote Happiness to featured it was lingering in the back of my mind...
Comment #11
dsquaredb commentedThanks for the explanation, @dddave. This is a good example of why we try to keep all the reviews on the issue that is attached to the organization node. Makes it a lot easier to see the history if the review process.