Support for Drupal 7 is ending on 5 January 2025—it’s time to migrate to Drupal 10! Learn about the many benefits of Drupal 10 and find migration tools in our resource center.
I'm not familiar with D7's history, but terms_from_node seems to be referencing an old node field, taxonomy, which I don't think is valid anymore. I've updated the plugin to use field_info_instances() to find taxonomy term fields which seems to be the common practice.
Patch attached.
Comment | File | Size | Author |
---|---|---|---|
terms_from_node_taxonomy.patch | 1.34 KB | inolen |
Comments
Comment #1
inolen CreditAttribution: inolen commentedI'm curious to know as I'm new to the Drupal community, is there a better way to tag issues/suggested patches to make sure they are noticed/reviewed by devs?
Comment #2
merlinofchaos CreditAttribution: merlinofchaos commentedYou did this correctly. Your patch was noticed, but I'm very busy and right nwo I'm trying to get a Views 7.x-rc out, so CTools patches are not getting looked at until I get back to it.
Sorry, this is the curse of having 3 major projects.
Comment #3
inolen CreditAttribution: inolen commentedNo worries, I wasn't at all trying to sound pushy, I just wanted to make sure I was being effective :)
Thanks for all the hard work.
Comment #4
merlinofchaos CreditAttribution: merlinofchaos commentedFinally got back around to this. It turns out one minor problem is that this was not marked 'needs review', and I didn't notice that when I wrote #2. I've had a couple of patch review sessions since I posted that, but always missed this because it's just reported as a bug that needs fixing.
Anyway, your fix looks reasonable, so I committed it.