Some relations are defined in the RDF mappings but not in RDF such as skos:inScheme or skos:broader. would be good to have these in the RDF model, RDFa could be done at the worst via <meta> tags in <head>.

Comments

scor’s picture

scor commented
Title: Add skos:broader relation to RDF output » Add relations which are not visible in core RDFa to RDF output

make title more generic

scor’s picture

scor commented
Project: Resource Description Framework (RDF) » RDF Extensions
scor’s picture

scor commented
Issue tags: +RDF, +sprint

tagging

scor’s picture

scor commented
Issue summary: View changes

updating OP with accurate description

Anonymous’s picture

Anonymous (not verified) commented
Title: Add relations which are not visible in core RDFa to RDF output » Add relations which are not visible in core RDFa to RDFa output and RDF model

In general, I believe we should to try to ensure that the different serializations of the same resource match as much as possible. This would mean it should be added to both the RDFa and the RDF model.

Anonymous’s picture

Anonymous (not verified) commented

scor mentioned in the Google Hangout, there may be a URI in RestWS for the vocabulary. We could then create the relationship between the term and vocabulary in both RDFa and rdfx_get_model and also expose rdfx_get_model info for the vocabulary at it's URI. The vocabulary itself would not be exposed in RDFa because there is no HTML page for the vocabulary.

mlncn’s picture

mlncn commented

Function in question is rdfx_get_rdf_model() and i'm hoping a more complete example / use case would help indicate what work needs to be done. And the RDFa work belongs to Drupal core?

mlncn’s picture

mlncn commented
Issue summary: View changes

Added wrapping code tags.