Support for Drupal 7 is ending on 5 January 2025—it’s time to migrate to Drupal 10! Learn about the many benefits of Drupal 10 and find migration tools in our resource center.
Problem/Motivation
Noticed this while reviewing #3191468: Retire "Admin UI and JavaScript Modernisation" initiative in favour of "Decoupled menus" and the upcoming "Easy out of the box" initiative. The Drupal 9 MAINTAINERS.txt file refers to "subsystem maintainers for Drupal 8" and "initiative coordinators for Drupal 8".
Proposed resolution
Remove the references to Drupal 8 so that the file is forward-compatible with Drupal 9 and 10.
Comment | File | Size | Author |
---|---|---|---|
#11 | maintainers-3195277-11.patch | 1018 bytes | xjm |
d9-actually.patch | 1.02 KB | xjm | |
Comments
Comment #2
xjmComment #3
quietone CreditAttribution: quietone as a volunteer commentedHaven't looked at maintainters.txt in a while so I applied the patch and read through it. This removes all references to the version of Drupal.
Comment #4
Gábor HojtsyNote that this was already covered in #3191699: MAINTAINERS.txt role descriptions outdated, topic maintainer description missing, provisional maintainership incorrect that @xjm already reviewed along with other problems in the same areas such as the incorrect community initiatives link in the strategic initiatives section that is visible in the last hunk.
So I believe this is a duplicate of that issue.
Comment #5
quietone CreditAttribution: quietone as a volunteer commentedI looked at the MR for #3191699: MAINTAINERS.txt role descriptions outdated, topic maintainer description missing, provisional maintainership incorrect and this patch is a subset of those changes. Gábor Hojtsy, is correct this is a duplicate.
So changing the status.
Comment #6
xjmIMO the changes in #3191699: MAINTAINERS.txt role descriptions outdated, topic maintainer description missing, provisional maintainership incorrect are not well-scoped, but not a big enough deal to push back.
Comment #7
Gábor HojtsyHow would scoping be better? For example the last hunk in this patch has a link to community initiatives, not strategic initiatives which makes governance definition confusing / incorrect. One could say it's the same "people can figure it out" as Drupal 8 vs 9 but probably more confusing. Should that be its own issue? Also, the missing description of topic maintainers should be its own issue? What would be best?
Comment #8
Gábor HojtsySpeaking of the first two lines here. The linked page neither lists the initiatives listed in MAINTAINERS.txt nor explains the responsibility of *anyone*, especially not the responsibilities of the people listed below. Should that be its own issue? I had that in #3191699: MAINTAINERS.txt role descriptions outdated, topic maintainer description missing, provisional maintainership incorrect because it was fixing the role description very similar to how the "Drupal 8" part was incorrect.
Comment #9
Gábor HojtsyThe scoping discussions in #3191699: MAINTAINERS.txt role descriptions outdated, topic maintainer description missing, provisional maintainership incorrect did not work out, so reopening this for commit.
Comment #10
alexpottThe patch doesn't apply.
Comment #11
xjmComment #12
Gábor HojtsyReroll looks good.
Comment #13
alexpottCommitted and pushed 2dd332b788 to 9.2.x and 46cb915a39 to 9.1.x. Thanks!