the Schema module reports:

column revision_id - difference on: length
declared: array('description' => 'TODO: please describe this field!', 'type' => 'int', 'unsigned' => TRUE, 'length' => 10, 'not null' => FALSE)
actual: array('description' => 'The current version identifier.', 'type' => 'int', 'unsigned' => TRUE, 'not null' => FALSE)

If memory serves a INT definition doesn't require a length to be added to it. If I delete the definition the issue goes away.

Thanks in advance.

Comments

cmriley created an issue. See original summary.

johnv’s picture

Title: Schema issue in workflow_node_history » Schema issue in workflow_node_history/workflow_acces

OK, I installed Schema module. I corrected the error.
There was also a remark on workflow_access table, which I corrected.
I disabled, uninstalled and installed workflow_access, added records and all seems OK.,

  • johnv committed 90454db on 7.x-2.x
    Issue #2610238: Schema issue in workflow_node_history/workflow_acces
    
johnv’s picture

I checked D8:
workflow_node_history: that is now in WorkflowTransition::baseFieldDefinitions();
workflow_access: it was alrady changed tot the new Varchar32 definition. It still has " ''default' => '', "
I left that, but added the description.

  • johnv committed 6095ab9 on 8.x-1.x
    Issue #2610238: Schema issue in workflow_node_history/workflow_access
    
johnv’s picture

Title: Schema issue in workflow_node_history/workflow_acces » Schema issue in workflow_node_history/workflow_access
Status: Active » Fixed

Thanks.

  • johnv committed 8b4c3ad on 7.x-2.x
    Issue #2610238: Schema issue in workflow_node_history/workflow_access
    

Status: Fixed » Closed (fixed)

Automatically closed - issue fixed for 2 weeks with no activity.