Closed (fixed)
Project:
Panels Bootstrap Layouts
Version:
7.x-3.x-dev
Component:
Code
Priority:
Normal
Category:
Support request
Assigned:
Unassigned
Reporter:
Created:
15 Jul 2015 at 13:14 UTC
Updated:
7 Jan 2025 at 07:24 UTC
Jump to comment: Most recent, Most recent file
Comments
Comment #1
blur702I only see the two and three column layout options as well. Am I missing something?
Comment #2
mrded commentedThat's right, there are only two layouts. Do you need more?
Comment #3
Syntapse commentedyes please unless i can easily modify these layouts and create new ones. A builder would also be great!
Comment #4
mrded commentedIf you need more layouts - you can create additional mini-panels and insert them into columns of provided layouts.
What's why I decided to create just two, because you can always extend it.
Comment #5
sonicthoughts commentedMore layouts should simplify and reduce need for mini-panels (especially for novices), but IMO if a single column might be nice :)
Comment #6
Syntapse commenteda builder would be useful. is there a way to change layouts of the existing two from the UI?
Comment #7
mrded commented7.x-1.x version use to have multiple layouts, and I found what two (2 & 3 columns) is more than enough, because:
@laurencefass, sorry, I misunderstood what you meant. You can use default panel's builder.
Comment #8
zmove commentedI think the best things to do is to merge efforts with Panels boostrap layout builder
I maintained this module but I don't have time anymore (letting the module with some critical issue). The best future for it would be to be integrated with Panels bootstrap layout who have the same purpose (provide bootstrap layouts for panels) but have more success.
Alex
Comment #9
sonicthoughts commented+1 for merge! My concern about the builder is performance (I assume it is the same issue with the panel builder.) @mrded - what do you think? Made FR #2547651: Merge with bootstrap panel layouts
Comment #10
mrded commentedThank you for suggestions guys.
I also have no much time to maintain my modules, that's why I'm trying to keep them as simple as it's possible (less things to break/maintain).
In addition, any extra features may discourage existing users.
Another thing is, projects of my company are happy with current implementation, that means what any extra features are not going to be sponsored. I'll need to do that on my free time (which could take some time).
However, I'll have a look at panels_bootstrap_layout_builder module, let's see what can we merge.
Thanks
Comment #11
csc4 commentedAlso - could I suggest you change the project image as it's misleading suggesting you should see eight layouts...
Comment #12
adriaav commentedtotally agree with #31, i thought i was doing something wrong that's why i came up here...
thanks!
Comment #13
WorldFallz commentedYep, I would definitely update the project page image. I wasted a bit of time myself trying to figure out if something was wrong before reading the code.
Also, I would respectfully ask to reconsider adding back a bricks style layout. I would think it's a very common one. And while the 2 and 3 column layouts can be achieved by simply not populating the undesired regions with content and/or modifying the column widths in the pane style settings, a bricks layout is not.
Attached is a small patch that does exactly this. It's requires even less changes since the refactoring of the bootstrap_region.inc file.
I also volunteer to co-maintain if that would help at all.
Comment #14
WorldFallz commentedAnd the image.
Comment #15
WorldFallz commentedAnd for convenience of others, here's a patch against 7.x-3.0 as well.
Comment #16
candelas commentedThanks for your module. I think it would be useful to have also 4 and 6 columns. I have to build now a 6 columns node display with Panelizer and I miss that possibility.
Comment #17
ikeigenwijs commentedworks as advertised.
Comment #18
Christopher Riley commentedIt has been a while since this was last touched upon. Any chance of getting it pushed to production?
Comment #20
aburrows commentedCommitted with thanks :)
Comment #22
astonvictor commentedsince, the issue was already committed then we can close the issue.
Comment #23
astonvictor commented